Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Dodge Durango Hybrid Specs
Chrysler started to build the Dodge Durango Hybrid 2009 in fall 2008, featuring the 340 hp (254 kW) 5.7 L (345 cu in) Hemi engine with MDS as well as the new Two-Mode Hybrid system developed with General Motors and BMW. The manufacturer claimed an almost 25% gain overall fuel fuel economy and an almost 40% gain in the city.EPA testing on the Hybrid Durango with the Hemi V8 engine indicates fuel
2010 Dodge Journey Marketing
Dodge Journeys assembled and marketed in Japan are known as Dodge JC.As part of the vehicle's introductory promotion, Dario Franchitti's No. 40 Dodge Charger carried a "Journey" paint scheme for the 2008 Daytona 500 on February 15, 2008.2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge Journey2010 Dodge
Aston Martin Rapide Information
The Aston Martin Rapide is a four-door, high-performance sport saloon, which British luxury marque Aston Martin introduced in early 2010 to compete with the Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class, and Porsche Panamera along with the upcoming Audi A7 and Lamborghini Estoque. It was first presented as a concept car at the North American International Auto Show in 2006. The Rapide name is a
Mazda MX-5 Miyako
Mazda must be very keen to commemorate the 20th birthday of its MX-5. Not satisfied with having just the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition that’s already on sale in the UK, the range is now being joined by the Miyako special edition which, according to Mazda, ‘continues’ to celebrate the occasion.
So what are the differences? Well, the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition is available only as a soft top, powered by the 124 bhp (92 kW / 126 PS) 1.8 litre engine. Costing £17,300 on the road, its specification includes unique finish 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, individually numbered Limited Edition scuff plates, special floor mats, body-coloured dashboard decoration panel, aluminium pedals, manual air con, leather steering wheel, gear knob and handbrake lever. Paint choices are Aurora Blue, True Red and Crystal White Pearlescent.
Similarly, the Miyako special edition also features 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, and special floor mats. Additionally, though, it gets unique Medici premium perforated black leather trim with a red underlay and stitching, climate control air con and the obligatory special badging.
Unsurprisingly, the extra equipment makes it a bit more expensive than the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition. Mazda is charging £18,385 for the 1.8i Miyako soft top, which comes in either Aluminium Silver Metallic or Velocity Red Mica.
For the first time, a special edition of the MX-5 is also available as a roadster coupe (the one with the folding powered roof). However, that version of the Miyako can only be had with the 157 bhp (117 kW / 160 PS) 2.0 litre engine, and it costs £20,885. Colour choice is restricted to just Aluminium Silver Metallic.
To put those prices into context, a standard 1.8i SE soft top with air con is £17,795, while the 2.0i SE roadster coupe would set you back £20,295. Given that leather trim and metallic paint alone come to £1,115 on the Mazda options list, the £590 premium being charged for the Miyako looks like good value.
The MX-5 Miyako special edition is on sale from the beginning of July, with 500 examples of each version being produced for the UK market. And, in case you were wondering, they are named after the Japanese holiday island of Miyako-jima.
So what are the differences? Well, the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition is available only as a soft top, powered by the 124 bhp (92 kW / 126 PS) 1.8 litre engine. Costing £17,300 on the road, its specification includes unique finish 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, individually numbered Limited Edition scuff plates, special floor mats, body-coloured dashboard decoration panel, aluminium pedals, manual air con, leather steering wheel, gear knob and handbrake lever. Paint choices are Aurora Blue, True Red and Crystal White Pearlescent.
Similarly, the Miyako special edition also features 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, and special floor mats. Additionally, though, it gets unique Medici premium perforated black leather trim with a red underlay and stitching, climate control air con and the obligatory special badging.
Unsurprisingly, the extra equipment makes it a bit more expensive than the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition. Mazda is charging £18,385 for the 1.8i Miyako soft top, which comes in either Aluminium Silver Metallic or Velocity Red Mica.
For the first time, a special edition of the MX-5 is also available as a roadster coupe (the one with the folding powered roof). However, that version of the Miyako can only be had with the 157 bhp (117 kW / 160 PS) 2.0 litre engine, and it costs £20,885. Colour choice is restricted to just Aluminium Silver Metallic.
To put those prices into context, a standard 1.8i SE soft top with air con is £17,795, while the 2.0i SE roadster coupe would set you back £20,295. Given that leather trim and metallic paint alone come to £1,115 on the Mazda options list, the £590 premium being charged for the Miyako looks like good value.
The MX-5 Miyako special edition is on sale from the beginning of July, with 500 examples of each version being produced for the UK market. And, in case you were wondering, they are named after the Japanese holiday island of Miyako-jima.
Mazda MX-5 Miyako
Mazda must be very keen to commemorate the 20th birthday of its MX-5. Not satisfied with having just the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition that’s already on sale in the UK, the range is now being joined by the Miyako special edition which, according to Mazda, ‘continues’ to celebrate the occasion.
So what are the differences? Well, the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition is available only as a soft top, powered by the 124 bhp (92 kW / 126 PS) 1.8 litre engine. Costing £17,300 on the road, its specification includes unique finish 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, individually numbered Limited Edition scuff plates, special floor mats, body-coloured dashboard decoration panel, aluminium pedals, manual air con, leather steering wheel, gear knob and handbrake lever. Paint choices are Aurora Blue, True Red and Crystal White Pearlescent.
Similarly, the Miyako special edition also features 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, and special floor mats. Additionally, though, it gets unique Medici premium perforated black leather trim with a red underlay and stitching, climate control air con and the obligatory special badging.
Unsurprisingly, the extra equipment makes it a bit more expensive than the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition. Mazda is charging £18,385 for the 1.8i Miyako soft top, which comes in either Aluminium Silver Metallic or Velocity Red Mica.
For the first time, a special edition of the MX-5 is also available as a roadster coupe (the one with the folding powered roof). However, that version of the Miyako can only be had with the 157 bhp (117 kW / 160 PS) 2.0 litre engine, and it costs £20,885. Colour choice is restricted to just Aluminium Silver Metallic.
To put those prices into context, a standard 1.8i SE soft top with air con is £17,795, while the 2.0i SE roadster coupe would set you back £20,295. Given that leather trim and metallic paint alone come to £1,115 on the Mazda options list, the £590 premium being charged for the Miyako looks like good value.
The MX-5 Miyako special edition is on sale from the beginning of July, with 500 examples of each version being produced for the UK market. And, in case you were wondering, they are named after the Japanese holiday island of Miyako-jima.
So what are the differences? Well, the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition is available only as a soft top, powered by the 124 bhp (92 kW / 126 PS) 1.8 litre engine. Costing £17,300 on the road, its specification includes unique finish 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, individually numbered Limited Edition scuff plates, special floor mats, body-coloured dashboard decoration panel, aluminium pedals, manual air con, leather steering wheel, gear knob and handbrake lever. Paint choices are Aurora Blue, True Red and Crystal White Pearlescent.
Similarly, the Miyako special edition also features 17" alloy wheels, front fog lights, a strut brace, and special floor mats. Additionally, though, it gets unique Medici premium perforated black leather trim with a red underlay and stitching, climate control air con and the obligatory special badging.
Unsurprisingly, the extra equipment makes it a bit more expensive than the 20th Anniversary Limited Edition. Mazda is charging £18,385 for the 1.8i Miyako soft top, which comes in either Aluminium Silver Metallic or Velocity Red Mica.
For the first time, a special edition of the MX-5 is also available as a roadster coupe (the one with the folding powered roof). However, that version of the Miyako can only be had with the 157 bhp (117 kW / 160 PS) 2.0 litre engine, and it costs £20,885. Colour choice is restricted to just Aluminium Silver Metallic.
To put those prices into context, a standard 1.8i SE soft top with air con is £17,795, while the 2.0i SE roadster coupe would set you back £20,295. Given that leather trim and metallic paint alone come to £1,115 on the Mazda options list, the £590 premium being charged for the Miyako looks like good value.
The MX-5 Miyako special edition is on sale from the beginning of July, with 500 examples of each version being produced for the UK market. And, in case you were wondering, they are named after the Japanese holiday island of Miyako-jima.
Mini gets mini revamp
Details of the 2011 Mini range have been announced. Visually, the changes aren’t that radical, the main alterations being revised bumpers, LED lights at the rear, five new colours and five new alloy wheel designs.
On the inside the centre console, steering wheel and air conditioning and audio controls have all been modified to improve the quality feel and work better ergonomically. Other changes include new upholstery and fascia trim choices. DAB radio is now standard on all models across the range, except for the entry-level Mini First.
The big news though is under the bonnet. Following the introduction of new petrol engines back in March, it’s now the turn of the diesels. Available as either a Cooper D with 110 bhp (82 kW / 112 PS) or One D with 88 bhp (66 kW / 90 PS), the new diesel engines feature light weight aluminium construction, common rail direct injection and turbochargers with variable turbine geometry.
Amazingly, both the Cooper D Hatch and One D Hatch both achieve 74.3 mpg (3.8 l/100km) on the combined cycle, while producing just 99 g/km of CO2. That means they’ll be eligible for the 100% Greener Vehicle Discount, if proposed changes to the London Congestion Charge are approved. Adding to their green credentials is the standard fitment of a diesel particulate filter and oxidation catalyst.
The 110 bhp unit will also feature in the Cooper D Convertible, the first time ever that a Mini soft top has been available with diesel power. Meanwhile, the Clubman line-up will include the One D and Cooper D. However, it’s worth noting that only the Hatch achieves sub-100 g/km CO2 emissions:
The 2011 Mini range will be go on sale this September, which also sees the launch of the new Mini Countryman. Prices have yet to be confirmed.
On the inside the centre console, steering wheel and air conditioning and audio controls have all been modified to improve the quality feel and work better ergonomically. Other changes include new upholstery and fascia trim choices. DAB radio is now standard on all models across the range, except for the entry-level Mini First.
The big news though is under the bonnet. Following the introduction of new petrol engines back in March, it’s now the turn of the diesels. Available as either a Cooper D with 110 bhp (82 kW / 112 PS) or One D with 88 bhp (66 kW / 90 PS), the new diesel engines feature light weight aluminium construction, common rail direct injection and turbochargers with variable turbine geometry.
Amazingly, both the Cooper D Hatch and One D Hatch both achieve 74.3 mpg (3.8 l/100km) on the combined cycle, while producing just 99 g/km of CO2. That means they’ll be eligible for the 100% Greener Vehicle Discount, if proposed changes to the London Congestion Charge are approved. Adding to their green credentials is the standard fitment of a diesel particulate filter and oxidation catalyst.
The 110 bhp unit will also feature in the Cooper D Convertible, the first time ever that a Mini soft top has been available with diesel power. Meanwhile, the Clubman line-up will include the One D and Cooper D. However, it’s worth noting that only the Hatch achieves sub-100 g/km CO2 emissions:
| Mini | 0-62 mph | Top Speed mph | Combined mpg | CO2 g/km |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One D Hatch | 11.4 | 115 | 74.3 | 99 |
| Cooper D Hatch | 9.7 | 123 | 74.3 | 99 |
| One D Clubman | 11.8 | 114 | 72.4 | 103 |
| Cooper D Clubman | 10.2 | 123 | 72.4 | 103 |
| Cooper D Convertible | 10.3 | 121 | 70.6 | 105 |
The 2011 Mini range will be go on sale this September, which also sees the launch of the new Mini Countryman. Prices have yet to be confirmed.
Mini gets mini revamp
Details of the 2011 Mini range have been announced. Visually, the changes aren’t that radical, the main alterations being revised bumpers, LED lights at the rear, five new colours and five new alloy wheel designs.
On the inside the centre console, steering wheel and air conditioning and audio controls have all been modified to improve the quality feel and work better ergonomically. Other changes include new upholstery and fascia trim choices. DAB radio is now standard on all models across the range, except for the entry-level Mini First.
The big news though is under the bonnet. Following the introduction of new petrol engines back in March, it’s now the turn of the diesels. Available as either a Cooper D with 110 bhp (82 kW / 112 PS) or One D with 88 bhp (66 kW / 90 PS), the new diesel engines feature light weight aluminium construction, common rail direct injection and turbochargers with variable turbine geometry.
Amazingly, both the Cooper D Hatch and One D Hatch both achieve 74.3 mpg (3.8 l/100km) on the combined cycle, while producing just 99 g/km of CO2. That means they’ll be eligible for the 100% Greener Vehicle Discount, if proposed changes to the London Congestion Charge are approved. Adding to their green credentials is the standard fitment of a diesel particulate filter and oxidation catalyst.
The 110 bhp unit will also feature in the Cooper D Convertible, the first time ever that a Mini soft top has been available with diesel power. Meanwhile, the Clubman line-up will include the One D and Cooper D. However, it’s worth noting that only the Hatch achieves sub-100 g/km CO2 emissions:
The 2011 Mini range will be go on sale this September, which also sees the launch of the new Mini Countryman. Prices have yet to be confirmed.
On the inside the centre console, steering wheel and air conditioning and audio controls have all been modified to improve the quality feel and work better ergonomically. Other changes include new upholstery and fascia trim choices. DAB radio is now standard on all models across the range, except for the entry-level Mini First.
The big news though is under the bonnet. Following the introduction of new petrol engines back in March, it’s now the turn of the diesels. Available as either a Cooper D with 110 bhp (82 kW / 112 PS) or One D with 88 bhp (66 kW / 90 PS), the new diesel engines feature light weight aluminium construction, common rail direct injection and turbochargers with variable turbine geometry.
Amazingly, both the Cooper D Hatch and One D Hatch both achieve 74.3 mpg (3.8 l/100km) on the combined cycle, while producing just 99 g/km of CO2. That means they’ll be eligible for the 100% Greener Vehicle Discount, if proposed changes to the London Congestion Charge are approved. Adding to their green credentials is the standard fitment of a diesel particulate filter and oxidation catalyst.
The 110 bhp unit will also feature in the Cooper D Convertible, the first time ever that a Mini soft top has been available with diesel power. Meanwhile, the Clubman line-up will include the One D and Cooper D. However, it’s worth noting that only the Hatch achieves sub-100 g/km CO2 emissions:
| Mini | 0-62 mph | Top Speed mph | Combined mpg | CO2 g/km |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One D Hatch | 11.4 | 115 | 74.3 | 99 |
| Cooper D Hatch | 9.7 | 123 | 74.3 | 99 |
| One D Clubman | 11.8 | 114 | 72.4 | 103 |
| Cooper D Clubman | 10.2 | 123 | 72.4 | 103 |
| Cooper D Convertible | 10.3 | 121 | 70.6 | 105 |
The 2011 Mini range will be go on sale this September, which also sees the launch of the new Mini Countryman. Prices have yet to be confirmed.
Monday, June 28, 2010
2010 European GP
Is it time to ditch Valencia from the Formula 1 calendar? The only interesting incidents during this weekend’s race were Mark Webber’s frightening crash (which thankfully he emerged unscathed from), Lewis Hamilton’s passing of the Safety Car (after which Fernando Alonso spent the rest of the afternoon on the radio whinging to his team), Kamui Kobayashi’s performance in his Sauber, and a stray bottle on the track.
Indeed, the excitement levels only mounted after the race, as everyone waited to see whether the race stewards would impose penalties on Jenson Button, Rubens Barrichello, Nico Hulkenberg, Robert Kubica, Vitaly Petrov, Adrian Sutil, Sebastien Buemi, Pedro de la Rosa and Vitantonio Liuzzi for going too quickly behind the Safety Car.
In the end, they were all each given a five second penalty, which hardly affected the standings: the moaning Alonso got promoted one place to eighth, while Nico Rosberg was awarded tenth place and a single point.
Yet again, the problem lies with the circuit layout, because it appears almost impossible to overtake. This was visibly demonstrated after the Safety Car returned to the pits. An out of place Kobayashi, who was running third (after he hadn’t bothered to stop for new tyres), headed a convoy of cars for lap after lap that made no real attempt to pass one another. That makes for a dull spectacle.
Ironically, two of the few passing manoeuvres during the race were later performed by Kobayashi after he eventually pitted. Exploiting the advantage of comparatively fresh tyres, he got by Alonso on the penultimate lap, and then overtook Buemi on the very last corner of the race.
Certainly Ferrari’s complaining isn’t doing them any favours. Yes, it was bad luck that Alonso ended up in ninth on the track after the Safety Car deployment, and the situation was even worse for Felipe Massa. But to claim that the result was in some way manipulated by the FIA against Ferrari is ridiculous, especially when many would argue that Ferrari has benefited from FIA decisions on several occasions in the past.
Indeed, the excitement levels only mounted after the race, as everyone waited to see whether the race stewards would impose penalties on Jenson Button, Rubens Barrichello, Nico Hulkenberg, Robert Kubica, Vitaly Petrov, Adrian Sutil, Sebastien Buemi, Pedro de la Rosa and Vitantonio Liuzzi for going too quickly behind the Safety Car.
In the end, they were all each given a five second penalty, which hardly affected the standings: the moaning Alonso got promoted one place to eighth, while Nico Rosberg was awarded tenth place and a single point.
Yet again, the problem lies with the circuit layout, because it appears almost impossible to overtake. This was visibly demonstrated after the Safety Car returned to the pits. An out of place Kobayashi, who was running third (after he hadn’t bothered to stop for new tyres), headed a convoy of cars for lap after lap that made no real attempt to pass one another. That makes for a dull spectacle.
Ironically, two of the few passing manoeuvres during the race were later performed by Kobayashi after he eventually pitted. Exploiting the advantage of comparatively fresh tyres, he got by Alonso on the penultimate lap, and then overtook Buemi on the very last corner of the race.
Certainly Ferrari’s complaining isn’t doing them any favours. Yes, it was bad luck that Alonso ended up in ninth on the track after the Safety Car deployment, and the situation was even worse for Felipe Massa. But to claim that the result was in some way manipulated by the FIA against Ferrari is ridiculous, especially when many would argue that Ferrari has benefited from FIA decisions on several occasions in the past.
2010 European GP
Is it time to ditch Valencia from the Formula 1 calendar? The only interesting incidents during this weekend’s race were Mark Webber’s frightening crash (which thankfully he emerged unscathed from), Lewis Hamilton’s passing of the Safety Car (after which Fernando Alonso spent the rest of the afternoon on the radio whinging to his team), Kamui Kobayashi’s performance in his Sauber, and a stray bottle on the track.
Indeed, the excitement levels only mounted after the race, as everyone waited to see whether the race stewards would impose penalties on Jenson Button, Rubens Barrichello, Nico Hulkenberg, Robert Kubica, Vitaly Petrov, Adrian Sutil, Sebastien Buemi, Pedro de la Rosa and Vitantonio Liuzzi for going too quickly behind the Safety Car.
In the end, they were all each given a five second penalty, which hardly affected the standings: the moaning Alonso got promoted one place to eighth, while Nico Rosberg was awarded tenth place and a single point.
Yet again, the problem lies with the circuit layout, because it appears almost impossible to overtake. This was visibly demonstrated after the Safety Car returned to the pits. An out of place Kobayashi, who was running third (after he hadn’t bothered to stop for new tyres), headed a convoy of cars for lap after lap that made no real attempt to pass one another. That makes for a dull spectacle.
Ironically, two of the few passing manoeuvres during the race were later performed by Kobayashi after he eventually pitted. Exploiting the advantage of comparatively fresh tyres, he got by Alonso on the penultimate lap, and then overtook Buemi on the very last corner of the race.
Certainly Ferrari’s complaining isn’t doing them any favours. Yes, it was bad luck that Alonso ended up in ninth on the track after the Safety Car deployment, and the situation was even worse for Felipe Massa. But to claim that the result was in some way manipulated by the FIA against Ferrari is ridiculous, especially when many would argue that Ferrari has benefited from FIA decisions on several occasions in the past.
Indeed, the excitement levels only mounted after the race, as everyone waited to see whether the race stewards would impose penalties on Jenson Button, Rubens Barrichello, Nico Hulkenberg, Robert Kubica, Vitaly Petrov, Adrian Sutil, Sebastien Buemi, Pedro de la Rosa and Vitantonio Liuzzi for going too quickly behind the Safety Car.
In the end, they were all each given a five second penalty, which hardly affected the standings: the moaning Alonso got promoted one place to eighth, while Nico Rosberg was awarded tenth place and a single point.
Yet again, the problem lies with the circuit layout, because it appears almost impossible to overtake. This was visibly demonstrated after the Safety Car returned to the pits. An out of place Kobayashi, who was running third (after he hadn’t bothered to stop for new tyres), headed a convoy of cars for lap after lap that made no real attempt to pass one another. That makes for a dull spectacle.
Ironically, two of the few passing manoeuvres during the race were later performed by Kobayashi after he eventually pitted. Exploiting the advantage of comparatively fresh tyres, he got by Alonso on the penultimate lap, and then overtook Buemi on the very last corner of the race.
Certainly Ferrari’s complaining isn’t doing them any favours. Yes, it was bad luck that Alonso ended up in ninth on the track after the Safety Car deployment, and the situation was even worse for Felipe Massa. But to claim that the result was in some way manipulated by the FIA against Ferrari is ridiculous, especially when many would argue that Ferrari has benefited from FIA decisions on several occasions in the past.
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Koenigsegg Cars Awards
* Red Dot- Award for excellent Design * National Swedish Design Price - Utmärkt Svensk Form * Entrepreneur of the Year Nomination - Företagarna Sweden * Powercar- Superexotic import of the year 2007 and 2008 - Germany * NÜRBURGRING- speed record * Top Gear speed- record * Nardo speed- record * Sport Auto- slalom record * Sport Auto- Hochenheim speed record * Sport Auto- 0-200 KM
BMW M3 Critical reception
Ezra Dyer of Automobile Magazine once suggested that "...car magazines generally regard the M3 the same way a four-year-old regards Santa Claus." Car and Driver praised the M3 so much that they placed the E90 M3 in first place in a comparison test against the Nissan GT-R and the Porsche 911 Turbo.BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3BMW M3All Review videos and
2010 BMW 7 Series High Security
BMW also built armoured versions of the 7 series vehicles. The models have protection levels VR6/VR7. Security features include laminated windows, carbon fibre reinforced armour plating, under body armour, emergency front windscreen exit, lowered door windows, run flat tires.2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010
Saturday, June 26, 2010
2011 Infiniti M Name
The "M" nameplate has been used on various mid-size cars from Infiniti. This includes the M30 Coupe/Convertible, and the M45 and M35 sedans, both of which are unrelated to the M30. The first-generation of the sedans are rebadged versions of the Japanese-spec Nissan Gloria, and later generations are based on the Nissan Fuga.2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti
2010 Infiniti QX56 features
The QX also features the updated Infiniti hard drive based navigation system with an 8 inch high-resolution VGA display. Infiniti' keyless SmartAccess with an "Intelligent Remote" key is standard along with 8 airbags including knee airbags for driver and front passenger as well as second row side torso airbags, the Adaptive Front-lighting System (AFS) is standard, while the Pre-Collision System (
Ferrari California Concept
The California represents a number of firsts for Ferrari: * The first front engined Ferrari with a V8 * The first to feature a 7-speed dual clutch transmission * The first with a folding metal roof * The first with multi-link rear suspension * The first with direct petrol injection.According to some sources originally started as a concept for a new Maserati, the resulting expense to
Ferrari 458 Italia Handling
The car's suspension will feature double wishbones at the front and a multi-link set-up at the rear, coupled with E-Diff and F1-Trac traction control systems, designed to improve the car's cornering and longitudinal acceleration by 32% compared to its predecessors.The brakes include a prefill function whereby the pistons in the calipers move the pads into contact with the discs on lift off to
Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano information
The 599 GTB Fiorano (internal code F141) is an Italian gran turismo produced by Ferrari. It is the brand's two-seat flagship, replacing the 575 M Maranello in 2006 as a 2007 model.Styled by Pininfarina under the direction of Ferrari's Frank Stephenson, the 599 GTB debuted at the Geneva Motor Show in February 2006. It is named for its total engine displacement (5999 cc), Gran Turismo Berlinetta
Ferrari F430 Spider review
The F430 Spider is the convertible version based on the coupé. The F430 Spider is Ferrari's 21st road going convertible. The Spider is—just like the coupé—quite similar in looks to the Ferrari 360.The roof panel automatically folds away inside a space above the engine bay. The conversion from a closed top to an open-air convertible is a two-stage folding-action. After a short to and fro the
Ferrari 612 Scaglietti information
ChassisThe 612 is Ferrari's second all-aluminium vehicle, the first being the 360 Modena. Its space frame (developed with Alcoa) is made from extrusions and castings of the material, and the aluminium body is welded on. The chassis of the 612 forms the basis of the 599 GTB.[edit] EngineThe 612 Scaglietti shares its engine with the Ferrari 575M Maranello. The engine has compression ratio of 11.2:1
Green Car Awards 2010
The Environmental Transport Association (ETA), a UK-based ethical motoring organisation and sustainable travel lobby group, has announced its 2010 Green Car Awards winners.
BMW took the honours in three of the nine categories. Toyota meanwhile won in two, plus its iQ was given the accolade of overall Green Car of the Year 2010. In deciding how the titles would be awarded, over 5,000 cars were assessed on their power, emissions, fuel efficiency and amount of noise produced.
The worst cars in each category were also named, with the Lamborghini Murcielago being declared the least-green car overall. Perhaps the LP 640’s 495 g/km of carbon dioxide emissions and combined cycle fuel consumption of 13.3 mpg (21.3 l/100 km) had something to do with it?
Some of the results seem a bit odd, though. For example, the winning Toyota iQ (presumably the entry level 1.0 VVT-i Manual) seems to be bettered in a number of key criteria by the car that (possibly) inspired it - the Smart fortwo.
According to the ETA’s own data, this is how the iQ compares to the diesel-engined fortwo:
* Smart actually quotes 86 g/km.
** Figure is combined hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen.
On the basis of those figures, the Smart would appear to be the much ‘greener’ car, unless the extra hydrocarbons and particulates its diesel engine produces are considered really harmful? However, there were plenty of other diesel cars that won their categories, so it would seem that argument doesn’t really stand up.
Apart from that, there are some models mentioned that are no longer produced (for instance the V6-powered Volkswagen Golf and the AMG version of Mercedes-Benz’s R-Class). And it seems that the greenest off-roader prize has gone to the whole of the BMW X1 range, rather than an individual model. Notwithstanding the issue that anyone contemplating taking an X1 off-road would need to be very adventurous (and have a proper off-roader on standby to rescue them shortly afterwards), there’s quite a difference in fuel consumption and emissions between the rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive versions.
So, perhaps the results need to be viewed with a degree of circumspection but, for what it’s worth, here is the list of the ETA Green Car Awards 2010 winners and losers:
BMW took the honours in three of the nine categories. Toyota meanwhile won in two, plus its iQ was given the accolade of overall Green Car of the Year 2010. In deciding how the titles would be awarded, over 5,000 cars were assessed on their power, emissions, fuel efficiency and amount of noise produced.
The worst cars in each category were also named, with the Lamborghini Murcielago being declared the least-green car overall. Perhaps the LP 640’s 495 g/km of carbon dioxide emissions and combined cycle fuel consumption of 13.3 mpg (21.3 l/100 km) had something to do with it?
Some of the results seem a bit odd, though. For example, the winning Toyota iQ (presumably the entry level 1.0 VVT-i Manual) seems to be bettered in a number of key criteria by the car that (possibly) inspired it - the Smart fortwo.
According to the ETA’s own data, this is how the iQ compares to the diesel-engined fortwo:
| Measure | iQ 1.0 VVT-i | fortwo cdi turbodiesel coupé |
|---|---|---|
| Combined cycle consumption | 4.3 l/100km / 65.7 mpg | 3.3 l/100km / 85.6 mpg |
| Fuel cost over 12,000 miles | £930 | £720 |
| CO2 g/km | 99 | 88* |
| Carbon monoxide g/km | 0.15 | 0.174 |
| Hydrocarbons g/km | 0.03 | 0.246** |
| Oxides of nitrogen g/km | 0.02 | 0.224 |
| Particulates g/km | N/A | 0.021 |
* Smart actually quotes 86 g/km.
** Figure is combined hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen.
On the basis of those figures, the Smart would appear to be the much ‘greener’ car, unless the extra hydrocarbons and particulates its diesel engine produces are considered really harmful? However, there were plenty of other diesel cars that won their categories, so it would seem that argument doesn’t really stand up.
Apart from that, there are some models mentioned that are no longer produced (for instance the V6-powered Volkswagen Golf and the AMG version of Mercedes-Benz’s R-Class). And it seems that the greenest off-roader prize has gone to the whole of the BMW X1 range, rather than an individual model. Notwithstanding the issue that anyone contemplating taking an X1 off-road would need to be very adventurous (and have a proper off-roader on standby to rescue them shortly afterwards), there’s quite a difference in fuel consumption and emissions between the rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive versions.
So, perhaps the results need to be viewed with a degree of circumspection but, for what it’s worth, here is the list of the ETA Green Car Awards 2010 winners and losers:
| Category | Best | Worst |
|---|---|---|
| Green Car of the Year 2010 | Toyota iQ | Lamborghini Murcielago |
| Greenest small family car | Honda Insight 1.3 | Volkswagen Golf 3.2 V6 |
| Greenest large family car | BMW 320d Touring | Vauxhall Insignia VXR V6 Turbo |
| Greenest supermini | Toyota Yaris 1.4 D-4D | Renault Clio Sport 200 |
| Greenest city car | Toyota iQ | Fiat Panda 1.4 100HP |
| Greenest sports car | Vauxhall Tigra | Lamborghini Murcielago |
| Greenest MPV | Peugeot Bipper Tepee | Mercedes-Benz R63 AMG |
| Greenest small MPV | Renault Modus 1.5dci | Vauxhall Zafira VXR 2.0i Turbo |
| Greenest off-road car | BMW X1 E84 | Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG |
| Greenest luxury car | BMW 740d | Bentley Brooklands |
Green Car Awards 2010
The Environmental Transport Association (ETA), a UK-based ethical motoring organisation and sustainable travel lobby group, has announced its 2010 Green Car Awards winners.
BMW took the honours in three of the nine categories. Toyota meanwhile won in two, plus its iQ was given the accolade of overall Green Car of the Year 2010. In deciding how the titles would be awarded, over 5,000 cars were assessed on their power, emissions, fuel efficiency and amount of noise produced.
The worst cars in each category were also named, with the Lamborghini Murcielago being declared the least-green car overall. Perhaps the LP 640’s 495 g/km of carbon dioxide emissions and combined cycle fuel consumption of 13.3 mpg (21.3 l/100 km) had something to do with it?
Some of the results seem a bit odd, though. For example, the winning Toyota iQ (presumably the entry level 1.0 VVT-i Manual) seems to be bettered in a number of key criteria by the car that (possibly) inspired it - the Smart fortwo.
According to the ETA’s own data, this is how the iQ compares to the diesel-engined fortwo:
* Smart actually quotes 86 g/km.
** Figure is combined hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen.
On the basis of those figures, the Smart would appear to be the much ‘greener’ car, unless the extra hydrocarbons and particulates its diesel engine produces are considered really harmful? However, there were plenty of other diesel cars that won their categories, so it would seem that argument doesn’t really stand up.
Apart from that, there are some models mentioned that are no longer produced (for instance the V6-powered Volkswagen Golf and the AMG version of Mercedes-Benz’s R-Class). And it seems that the greenest off-roader prize has gone to the whole of the BMW X1 range, rather than an individual model. Notwithstanding the issue that anyone contemplating taking an X1 off-road would need to be very adventurous (and have a proper off-roader on standby to rescue them shortly afterwards), there’s quite a difference in fuel consumption and emissions between the rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive versions.
So, perhaps the results need to be viewed with a degree of circumspection but, for what it’s worth, here is the list of the ETA Green Car Awards 2010 winners and losers:
BMW took the honours in three of the nine categories. Toyota meanwhile won in two, plus its iQ was given the accolade of overall Green Car of the Year 2010. In deciding how the titles would be awarded, over 5,000 cars were assessed on their power, emissions, fuel efficiency and amount of noise produced.
The worst cars in each category were also named, with the Lamborghini Murcielago being declared the least-green car overall. Perhaps the LP 640’s 495 g/km of carbon dioxide emissions and combined cycle fuel consumption of 13.3 mpg (21.3 l/100 km) had something to do with it?
Some of the results seem a bit odd, though. For example, the winning Toyota iQ (presumably the entry level 1.0 VVT-i Manual) seems to be bettered in a number of key criteria by the car that (possibly) inspired it - the Smart fortwo.
According to the ETA’s own data, this is how the iQ compares to the diesel-engined fortwo:
| Measure | iQ 1.0 VVT-i | fortwo cdi turbodiesel coupé |
|---|---|---|
| Combined cycle consumption | 4.3 l/100km / 65.7 mpg | 3.3 l/100km / 85.6 mpg |
| Fuel cost over 12,000 miles | £930 | £720 |
| CO2 g/km | 99 | 88* |
| Carbon monoxide g/km | 0.15 | 0.174 |
| Hydrocarbons g/km | 0.03 | 0.246** |
| Oxides of nitrogen g/km | 0.02 | 0.224 |
| Particulates g/km | N/A | 0.021 |
* Smart actually quotes 86 g/km.
** Figure is combined hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen.
On the basis of those figures, the Smart would appear to be the much ‘greener’ car, unless the extra hydrocarbons and particulates its diesel engine produces are considered really harmful? However, there were plenty of other diesel cars that won their categories, so it would seem that argument doesn’t really stand up.
Apart from that, there are some models mentioned that are no longer produced (for instance the V6-powered Volkswagen Golf and the AMG version of Mercedes-Benz’s R-Class). And it seems that the greenest off-roader prize has gone to the whole of the BMW X1 range, rather than an individual model. Notwithstanding the issue that anyone contemplating taking an X1 off-road would need to be very adventurous (and have a proper off-roader on standby to rescue them shortly afterwards), there’s quite a difference in fuel consumption and emissions between the rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive versions.
So, perhaps the results need to be viewed with a degree of circumspection but, for what it’s worth, here is the list of the ETA Green Car Awards 2010 winners and losers:
| Category | Best | Worst |
|---|---|---|
| Green Car of the Year 2010 | Toyota iQ | Lamborghini Murcielago |
| Greenest small family car | Honda Insight 1.3 | Volkswagen Golf 3.2 V6 |
| Greenest large family car | BMW 320d Touring | Vauxhall Insignia VXR V6 Turbo |
| Greenest supermini | Toyota Yaris 1.4 D-4D | Renault Clio Sport 200 |
| Greenest city car | Toyota iQ | Fiat Panda 1.4 100HP |
| Greenest sports car | Vauxhall Tigra | Lamborghini Murcielago |
| Greenest MPV | Peugeot Bipper Tepee | Mercedes-Benz R63 AMG |
| Greenest small MPV | Renault Modus 1.5dci | Vauxhall Zafira VXR 2.0i Turbo |
| Greenest off-road car | BMW X1 E84 | Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG |
| Greenest luxury car | BMW 740d | Bentley Brooklands |
Friday, June 25, 2010
Jaguar marks 75 years
To celebrate the marque’s 75th anniversary, Jaguar has announced a very special version of its XKR. Perhaps unsurprisingly named XKR 75 and limited to just (no prizes for guessing this) 75 examples, it will debut at next month’s Goodwood Festival of Speed.
The changes compared to a standard XKR are wide-ranging. Power from the 5.0 litre supercharged V8 is up from 503 bhp (375 kW / 510 PS) to 523 bhp (390 kW / 530 PS), which reduces the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) acceleration time from 4.6 to 4.4 seconds. Top speed is limited to 174 mph (280 km/h), an increase of 19 mph (30 km/h).
To make the most of the extra performance, the chassis has also been upgraded. Stiffer springs, increased damper rates, new aluminium uprights front and rear for increased camber stiffness, re-tuned Adaptive Dynamics damper control software and a reduced ride height (by 15 mm front / 10 mm rear) are all intended to give a more driver-focussed feel. Jaguar is claiming that refinement and ride comfort have not been sacrificed completely, though.
Visually, the XKR 75 is distinguished by its aerodynamic body kit. Consisting of a front splitter, rear diffuser, larger rear spoiler and side sills extensions, it has been designed to increase high speed stability. To complete the look, dark grey 20" Vortex forged lightweight alloy wheels and Stratus Grey paintwork come as standard. Thankfully, however, the rather dodgy (and superfluous) go-faster stripes - or ‘graphics pack’ in Jaguar-speak - are optional. On the inside, there’s Charcoal leather with ivory stitching, a piano black finish to the facia and centre console and a black suedecloth headlining.
Exclusivity doesn’t come cheap though. At £85,500 on the road in the UK, the XKR 75 is exactly £10,000 more than a normal XKR. But that still looks like pretty good value when compared to competing models such as the £87,335 BMW M6 Coupé or the £104,560 Mercedes-Benz SL 63 AMG.
The XKR 75 is available to order from July, with deliveries scheduled to start in October 2010.
The changes compared to a standard XKR are wide-ranging. Power from the 5.0 litre supercharged V8 is up from 503 bhp (375 kW / 510 PS) to 523 bhp (390 kW / 530 PS), which reduces the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) acceleration time from 4.6 to 4.4 seconds. Top speed is limited to 174 mph (280 km/h), an increase of 19 mph (30 km/h).
To make the most of the extra performance, the chassis has also been upgraded. Stiffer springs, increased damper rates, new aluminium uprights front and rear for increased camber stiffness, re-tuned Adaptive Dynamics damper control software and a reduced ride height (by 15 mm front / 10 mm rear) are all intended to give a more driver-focussed feel. Jaguar is claiming that refinement and ride comfort have not been sacrificed completely, though.
Visually, the XKR 75 is distinguished by its aerodynamic body kit. Consisting of a front splitter, rear diffuser, larger rear spoiler and side sills extensions, it has been designed to increase high speed stability. To complete the look, dark grey 20" Vortex forged lightweight alloy wheels and Stratus Grey paintwork come as standard. Thankfully, however, the rather dodgy (and superfluous) go-faster stripes - or ‘graphics pack’ in Jaguar-speak - are optional. On the inside, there’s Charcoal leather with ivory stitching, a piano black finish to the facia and centre console and a black suedecloth headlining.
Exclusivity doesn’t come cheap though. At £85,500 on the road in the UK, the XKR 75 is exactly £10,000 more than a normal XKR. But that still looks like pretty good value when compared to competing models such as the £87,335 BMW M6 Coupé or the £104,560 Mercedes-Benz SL 63 AMG.
The XKR 75 is available to order from July, with deliveries scheduled to start in October 2010.
Jaguar marks 75 years
To celebrate the marque’s 75th anniversary, Jaguar has announced a very special version of its XKR. Perhaps unsurprisingly named XKR 75 and limited to just (no prizes for guessing this) 75 examples, it will debut at next month’s Goodwood Festival of Speed.
The changes compared to a standard XKR are wide-ranging. Power from the 5.0 litre supercharged V8 is up from 503 bhp (375 kW / 510 PS) to 523 bhp (390 kW / 530 PS), which reduces the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) acceleration time from 4.6 to 4.4 seconds. Top speed is limited to 174 mph (280 km/h), an increase of 19 mph (30 km/h).
To make the most of the extra performance, the chassis has also been upgraded. Stiffer springs, increased damper rates, new aluminium uprights front and rear for increased camber stiffness, re-tuned Adaptive Dynamics damper control software and a reduced ride height (by 15 mm front / 10 mm rear) are all intended to give a more driver-focussed feel. Jaguar is claiming that refinement and ride comfort have not been sacrificed completely, though.
Visually, the XKR 75 is distinguished by its aerodynamic body kit. Consisting of a front splitter, rear diffuser, larger rear spoiler and side sills extensions, it has been designed to increase high speed stability. To complete the look, dark grey 20" Vortex forged lightweight alloy wheels and Stratus Grey paintwork come as standard. Thankfully, however, the rather dodgy (and superfluous) go-faster stripes - or ‘graphics pack’ in Jaguar-speak - are optional. On the inside, there’s Charcoal leather with ivory stitching, a piano black finish to the facia and centre console and a black suedecloth headlining.
Exclusivity doesn’t come cheap though. At £85,500 on the road in the UK, the XKR 75 is exactly £10,000 more than a normal XKR. But that still looks like pretty good value when compared to competing models such as the £87,335 BMW M6 Coupé or the £104,560 Mercedes-Benz SL 63 AMG.
The XKR 75 is available to order from July, with deliveries scheduled to start in October 2010.
The changes compared to a standard XKR are wide-ranging. Power from the 5.0 litre supercharged V8 is up from 503 bhp (375 kW / 510 PS) to 523 bhp (390 kW / 530 PS), which reduces the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) acceleration time from 4.6 to 4.4 seconds. Top speed is limited to 174 mph (280 km/h), an increase of 19 mph (30 km/h).
To make the most of the extra performance, the chassis has also been upgraded. Stiffer springs, increased damper rates, new aluminium uprights front and rear for increased camber stiffness, re-tuned Adaptive Dynamics damper control software and a reduced ride height (by 15 mm front / 10 mm rear) are all intended to give a more driver-focussed feel. Jaguar is claiming that refinement and ride comfort have not been sacrificed completely, though.
Visually, the XKR 75 is distinguished by its aerodynamic body kit. Consisting of a front splitter, rear diffuser, larger rear spoiler and side sills extensions, it has been designed to increase high speed stability. To complete the look, dark grey 20" Vortex forged lightweight alloy wheels and Stratus Grey paintwork come as standard. Thankfully, however, the rather dodgy (and superfluous) go-faster stripes - or ‘graphics pack’ in Jaguar-speak - are optional. On the inside, there’s Charcoal leather with ivory stitching, a piano black finish to the facia and centre console and a black suedecloth headlining.
Exclusivity doesn’t come cheap though. At £85,500 on the road in the UK, the XKR 75 is exactly £10,000 more than a normal XKR. But that still looks like pretty good value when compared to competing models such as the £87,335 BMW M6 Coupé or the £104,560 Mercedes-Benz SL 63 AMG.
The XKR 75 is available to order from July, with deliveries scheduled to start in October 2010.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Audi A4 Land speed record
In 2009, Hohenester Sport announced its modified HS 650 Audi B7 A4 quattro had set a new world speed record of the fastest biogas-powered car of 364.6 km/h (226.6 mph) at the test track in Papenburg, Lower Saxony, driven by Jürgen Hohenester. The vehicle includes a 3.0 litre twin-turbo V6 engine, with electronically limited 700 PS (515 kW; 690 bhp) rating.Audi A4 Audi A4 Audi A4 Audi A4 Audi A4
Vans Cars Information
A van is a kind of vehicle used for transporting goods or groups of people. It is usually a box-shaped vehicle on four wheels, about the same width and length as a large automobile, but taller and usually higher off the ground, also referred to as a light commercial vehicle or LCV. However, in North America, the term may be used to refer to any truck with a rigid cargo body fixed to the cab, even
BMW Cars History and structure
Founded in Boston in 1969,the organization began as an owner-support network, the club exists as a separate entity from BMW AG and its North American subsidiary, although there is a close working relationship, such as discounts on vehicles and parts provided to club members by the company.BMW CarsBMW CarsCurrently headquartered in Greenville, SC, the BMW CCA is a not-for-profit corporation,
Cars Etymology
The word automobile comes, via the French automobile, from the Ancient Greek word αὐτός (autós, "self") and the Latin mobilis ("movable"); meaning a vehicle that moves itself, rather than being pulled or pushed by a separate animal or another vehicle. The alternative name car is believed to originate from the Latin word carrus or carrum ("wheeled vehicle"), or the Middle English word carre ("cart
Lincoln MKT information
The Lincoln MKT is a luxury crossover utility vehicle, first unveiled as a concept vehicle at the 2008 North American International Auto Show. It entered production at the Oakville Assembly plant in July 2009 as a 2010 model. It shares the same crossover D4 platform as the Ford Flex with seating for up to 7 in 3 rows. It has an entirely different body with design cues from the Lincoln MKR concept
2011 Lincoln MKS information
The MKS is based on Ford's D3 platform, which is shared with the current Ford Taurus and other vehicles. The car is front-wheel drive with optional all-wheel drive. The MKS is powered by a 3.7 L Duratec V6 mated to a 6-speed automatic transmission. An optional EcoBoost 3.5 L twin-turbo, direct injection V6 is also available.The MKS can seat up to five people. The MKS debuted with a base MSRP of
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
FIA agrees F1 changes
Following today’s meeting of the FIA World Motor Sport Council, which took place in Geneva, several changes have been agreed for the 2011 Formula 1 season.
Pirelli has been named as sole tyre supplier, following Bridgestone’s decision to withdraw after the 2010 championship. The contract will run for a term of three years, the Italian firm being chosen over rivals Michelin and Cooper Avon. Perhaps, though, it would give the series an extra competitive element if multiple tyre providers were represented?
Of potential concern to Lotus Racing, HRT F1 Team and Virgin Racing (plus any more newcomers) is the reintroduction of the ‘107%’ rule for next year. Originally included in the regulations from 1996 to 2002, it seems the increasingly widening gap in pace between teams has prompted its return.
It will mean that any driver whose first qualifying session performance exceeds 107% of the fastest time will not be allowed to take part in the race. However, sensibly, the WMSC has decided that in exceptional circumstances - such as previously setting a decent lap time in free practice - the stewards may allow a car to start from the back of the grid. This safeguard will mean that top-level drivers who fail to complete first qualifying, as Fernando Alonso did when he crashed his Ferrari at Monaco earlier this season, will still be able to participate.
In yet another attempt to increase overtaking opportunities, cars will be fitted with driver-adjustable rear wings in 2011. Only available after two laps have been completed, a driver will have to be less than a second behind a competitor at one of the pre-determined points around the circuit if he wants to use the system, which then becomes disabled when the brakes are used. Adjustable front wings, devices such as McLaren’s ‘F-duct’ and anything else that allows drivers to change the aerodynamics of their cars will be banned.
Away from F1, the WMSC also agreed that the name of the co-driver will now be displayed alongside that of the driver on the rear side windows of cars competing in the World Rally Championship. The ruling also applies to the FIA Regional Rally Championships, and comes into force with immediate effect. It seems only fair, because without their co-driver calling out the pace notes, a rally driver might as well get out and walk.
Pirelli has been named as sole tyre supplier, following Bridgestone’s decision to withdraw after the 2010 championship. The contract will run for a term of three years, the Italian firm being chosen over rivals Michelin and Cooper Avon. Perhaps, though, it would give the series an extra competitive element if multiple tyre providers were represented?
Of potential concern to Lotus Racing, HRT F1 Team and Virgin Racing (plus any more newcomers) is the reintroduction of the ‘107%’ rule for next year. Originally included in the regulations from 1996 to 2002, it seems the increasingly widening gap in pace between teams has prompted its return.
It will mean that any driver whose first qualifying session performance exceeds 107% of the fastest time will not be allowed to take part in the race. However, sensibly, the WMSC has decided that in exceptional circumstances - such as previously setting a decent lap time in free practice - the stewards may allow a car to start from the back of the grid. This safeguard will mean that top-level drivers who fail to complete first qualifying, as Fernando Alonso did when he crashed his Ferrari at Monaco earlier this season, will still be able to participate.
In yet another attempt to increase overtaking opportunities, cars will be fitted with driver-adjustable rear wings in 2011. Only available after two laps have been completed, a driver will have to be less than a second behind a competitor at one of the pre-determined points around the circuit if he wants to use the system, which then becomes disabled when the brakes are used. Adjustable front wings, devices such as McLaren’s ‘F-duct’ and anything else that allows drivers to change the aerodynamics of their cars will be banned.
Away from F1, the WMSC also agreed that the name of the co-driver will now be displayed alongside that of the driver on the rear side windows of cars competing in the World Rally Championship. The ruling also applies to the FIA Regional Rally Championships, and comes into force with immediate effect. It seems only fair, because without their co-driver calling out the pace notes, a rally driver might as well get out and walk.
FIA agrees F1 changes
Following today’s meeting of the FIA World Motor Sport Council, which took place in Geneva, several changes have been agreed for the 2011 Formula 1 season.
Pirelli has been named as sole tyre supplier, following Bridgestone’s decision to withdraw after the 2010 championship. The contract will run for a term of three years, the Italian firm being chosen over rivals Michelin and Cooper Avon. Perhaps, though, it would give the series an extra competitive element if multiple tyre providers were represented?
Of potential concern to Lotus Racing, HRT F1 Team and Virgin Racing (plus any more newcomers) is the reintroduction of the ‘107%’ rule for next year. Originally included in the regulations from 1996 to 2002, it seems the increasingly widening gap in pace between teams has prompted its return.
It will mean that any driver whose first qualifying session performance exceeds 107% of the fastest time will not be allowed to take part in the race. However, sensibly, the WMSC has decided that in exceptional circumstances - such as previously setting a decent lap time in free practice - the stewards may allow a car to start from the back of the grid. This safeguard will mean that top-level drivers who fail to complete first qualifying, as Fernando Alonso did when he crashed his Ferrari at Monaco earlier this season, will still be able to participate.
In yet another attempt to increase overtaking opportunities, cars will be fitted with driver-adjustable rear wings in 2011. Only available after two laps have been completed, a driver will have to be less than a second behind a competitor at one of the pre-determined points around the circuit if he wants to use the system, which then becomes disabled when the brakes are used. Adjustable front wings, devices such as McLaren’s ‘F-duct’ and anything else that allows drivers to change the aerodynamics of their cars will be banned.
Away from F1, the WMSC also agreed that the name of the co-driver will now be displayed alongside that of the driver on the rear side windows of cars competing in the World Rally Championship. The ruling also applies to the FIA Regional Rally Championships, and comes into force with immediate effect. It seems only fair, because without their co-driver calling out the pace notes, a rally driver might as well get out and walk.
Pirelli has been named as sole tyre supplier, following Bridgestone’s decision to withdraw after the 2010 championship. The contract will run for a term of three years, the Italian firm being chosen over rivals Michelin and Cooper Avon. Perhaps, though, it would give the series an extra competitive element if multiple tyre providers were represented?
Of potential concern to Lotus Racing, HRT F1 Team and Virgin Racing (plus any more newcomers) is the reintroduction of the ‘107%’ rule for next year. Originally included in the regulations from 1996 to 2002, it seems the increasingly widening gap in pace between teams has prompted its return.
It will mean that any driver whose first qualifying session performance exceeds 107% of the fastest time will not be allowed to take part in the race. However, sensibly, the WMSC has decided that in exceptional circumstances - such as previously setting a decent lap time in free practice - the stewards may allow a car to start from the back of the grid. This safeguard will mean that top-level drivers who fail to complete first qualifying, as Fernando Alonso did when he crashed his Ferrari at Monaco earlier this season, will still be able to participate.
In yet another attempt to increase overtaking opportunities, cars will be fitted with driver-adjustable rear wings in 2011. Only available after two laps have been completed, a driver will have to be less than a second behind a competitor at one of the pre-determined points around the circuit if he wants to use the system, which then becomes disabled when the brakes are used. Adjustable front wings, devices such as McLaren’s ‘F-duct’ and anything else that allows drivers to change the aerodynamics of their cars will be banned.
Away from F1, the WMSC also agreed that the name of the co-driver will now be displayed alongside that of the driver on the rear side windows of cars competing in the World Rally Championship. The ruling also applies to the FIA Regional Rally Championships, and comes into force with immediate effect. It seems only fair, because without their co-driver calling out the pace notes, a rally driver might as well get out and walk.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Alvis 4.3 Litre reborn
Visitors to next month’s Goodwood Festival of Speed will get to see the first steps towards the reintroduction of the Alvis 4.3 Litre, a model originally launched in 1937 and sold for just three years.
166 4.3 Litre chassis were originally made but Red Triangle - the firm that took over the complete stock of parts, nearly 22,000 Car Records, works drawings, correspondence files and data sheets after Alvis ceased all car manufacturing in 1967 - discovered there were 77 more chassis officially sanctioned. However, these were never built because the war halted production in 1940.
The newly-formed Alvis Car Company has been set up to manufacture these ‘missing’ chassis and their accompanying 4.3 litre straight-six engines as a continuation series. Examples of both will be displayed for the first time at Goodwood.
To ensue authenticity, the original technical drawings are being used as the basis for production, albeit allied to the benefits of CAD / CAM technology. The engine, which made the Alvis 4.3 Litre the quickest non-supercharged production car of its time, will also remain faithful to the original design. That is apart from a couple of changes: so that it complies with emissions standards, very un-1930s fuel injection and engine management will feature.
It’s planned that other carefully selected Alvis models will also get the continuation treatment in the future.
166 4.3 Litre chassis were originally made but Red Triangle - the firm that took over the complete stock of parts, nearly 22,000 Car Records, works drawings, correspondence files and data sheets after Alvis ceased all car manufacturing in 1967 - discovered there were 77 more chassis officially sanctioned. However, these were never built because the war halted production in 1940.
The newly-formed Alvis Car Company has been set up to manufacture these ‘missing’ chassis and their accompanying 4.3 litre straight-six engines as a continuation series. Examples of both will be displayed for the first time at Goodwood.
To ensue authenticity, the original technical drawings are being used as the basis for production, albeit allied to the benefits of CAD / CAM technology. The engine, which made the Alvis 4.3 Litre the quickest non-supercharged production car of its time, will also remain faithful to the original design. That is apart from a couple of changes: so that it complies with emissions standards, very un-1930s fuel injection and engine management will feature.
It’s planned that other carefully selected Alvis models will also get the continuation treatment in the future.
Alvis 4.3 Litre reborn
Visitors to next month’s Goodwood Festival of Speed will get to see the first steps towards the reintroduction of the Alvis 4.3 Litre, a model originally launched in 1937 and sold for just three years.
166 4.3 Litre chassis were originally made but Red Triangle - the firm that took over the complete stock of parts, nearly 22,000 Car Records, works drawings, correspondence files and data sheets after Alvis ceased all car manufacturing in 1967 - discovered there were 77 more chassis officially sanctioned. However, these were never built because the war halted production in 1940.
The newly-formed Alvis Car Company has been set up to manufacture these ‘missing’ chassis and their accompanying 4.3 litre straight-six engines as a continuation series. Examples of both will be displayed for the first time at Goodwood.
To ensue authenticity, the original technical drawings are being used as the basis for production, albeit allied to the benefits of CAD / CAM technology. The engine, which made the Alvis 4.3 Litre the quickest non-supercharged production car of its time, will also remain faithful to the original design. That is apart from a couple of changes: so that it complies with emissions standards, very un-1930s fuel injection and engine management will feature.
It’s planned that other carefully selected Alvis models will also get the continuation treatment in the future.
166 4.3 Litre chassis were originally made but Red Triangle - the firm that took over the complete stock of parts, nearly 22,000 Car Records, works drawings, correspondence files and data sheets after Alvis ceased all car manufacturing in 1967 - discovered there were 77 more chassis officially sanctioned. However, these were never built because the war halted production in 1940.
The newly-formed Alvis Car Company has been set up to manufacture these ‘missing’ chassis and their accompanying 4.3 litre straight-six engines as a continuation series. Examples of both will be displayed for the first time at Goodwood.
To ensue authenticity, the original technical drawings are being used as the basis for production, albeit allied to the benefits of CAD / CAM technology. The engine, which made the Alvis 4.3 Litre the quickest non-supercharged production car of its time, will also remain faithful to the original design. That is apart from a couple of changes: so that it complies with emissions standards, very un-1930s fuel injection and engine management will feature.
It’s planned that other carefully selected Alvis models will also get the continuation treatment in the future.
Monday, June 21, 2010
End of Exige in Europe?
It looks like the Lotus range in Europe could be decimated at the end of 2010. The reason is that the Toyota-sourced 1.8 litre engine, used in the Elise and Exige, is not compliant with Euro 5 emissions regulations.
That may surprise some people because, despite being quick cars, they have fairly good fuel economy and their carbon dioxide levels aren’t too awful. For example, the normally aspirated Elise R will do 34.4 mpg (8.2 l/100 km) on the combined cycle while producing 196 g/km of CO2.
But none of that matters, because Euro 5 focuses only on permitted amounts of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter in exhaust gasses. The Euro 5 standard came into force across the European Union for newly-launched models in September 2009, and will apply to all cars on sale (regardless of their original introduction dates) from January 2011.
Consequently, production of the European versions of the Elise R, Elise SC, Exige S and Exige Cup 260 will have to end. However, Lotus is keen to stress that manufacture will continue for other markets. So what does that leave for Europe? The answer is no Exige models and only one Elise - the recently introduced ‘base’ variant with its Euro 5 compliant 1.6 litre Toyota engine, which generates 134 bhp (100 kW / 136 PS).
With large gaps in the line-up to be filled, perhaps Lotus will take the opportunity to further divide the engineering philosophies behind the two cars? After all, there have recently been rumours of a V6-powered Exige being developed, probably using the engine from the Evora. By contrast, the Elise could stick to four-cylinder power, with additional adaptations of the 1.6 litre unit.
In the meantime, Lotus has decided to mark the European demise of the 1.8 litre cars with a couple of bespoke versions. The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition carry the initials of Roger Becker, former Director of Vehicle Engineering for Lotus who retired from the Norfolk firm in January after 44 years.
The supercharged Elise SC RGB, with 217 bhp (163 kW / 220 PS), can accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in just 4.6 seconds. That time is eclipsed by the Exige S RGB though, which does the same sprint in half a second less thanks to its 257 bhp (191 kW / 260 PS) engine, as usually found in the Exige Cup 260.
Both will be available in a choice of Aspen White, Starlight Black, Solar Yellow or Carbon Grey paint finishes, with Roger Becker’s signature on the side of the body and a special monochrome Lotus nose badge. The effect is finished off by a numbered plaque in the cabin.
The specification of the Elise SC RGB, which costs £38,550 in the UK, includes ultra lightweight forged alloy wheels, Sport Pack, Touring Pack and air conditioning.
In addition, the £41,950 Exige S RGB gets the Performance Pack. That consists of 308 mm front discs with AP Racing four-piston calipers, uprated front and rear brake pads, full length roof scoop, variable traction control, launch control and an uprated clutch plate and cover.
The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition will be available from September 2010.
That may surprise some people because, despite being quick cars, they have fairly good fuel economy and their carbon dioxide levels aren’t too awful. For example, the normally aspirated Elise R will do 34.4 mpg (8.2 l/100 km) on the combined cycle while producing 196 g/km of CO2.
But none of that matters, because Euro 5 focuses only on permitted amounts of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter in exhaust gasses. The Euro 5 standard came into force across the European Union for newly-launched models in September 2009, and will apply to all cars on sale (regardless of their original introduction dates) from January 2011.
Consequently, production of the European versions of the Elise R, Elise SC, Exige S and Exige Cup 260 will have to end. However, Lotus is keen to stress that manufacture will continue for other markets. So what does that leave for Europe? The answer is no Exige models and only one Elise - the recently introduced ‘base’ variant with its Euro 5 compliant 1.6 litre Toyota engine, which generates 134 bhp (100 kW / 136 PS).
With large gaps in the line-up to be filled, perhaps Lotus will take the opportunity to further divide the engineering philosophies behind the two cars? After all, there have recently been rumours of a V6-powered Exige being developed, probably using the engine from the Evora. By contrast, the Elise could stick to four-cylinder power, with additional adaptations of the 1.6 litre unit.
In the meantime, Lotus has decided to mark the European demise of the 1.8 litre cars with a couple of bespoke versions. The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition carry the initials of Roger Becker, former Director of Vehicle Engineering for Lotus who retired from the Norfolk firm in January after 44 years.
The supercharged Elise SC RGB, with 217 bhp (163 kW / 220 PS), can accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in just 4.6 seconds. That time is eclipsed by the Exige S RGB though, which does the same sprint in half a second less thanks to its 257 bhp (191 kW / 260 PS) engine, as usually found in the Exige Cup 260.
Both will be available in a choice of Aspen White, Starlight Black, Solar Yellow or Carbon Grey paint finishes, with Roger Becker’s signature on the side of the body and a special monochrome Lotus nose badge. The effect is finished off by a numbered plaque in the cabin.
The specification of the Elise SC RGB, which costs £38,550 in the UK, includes ultra lightweight forged alloy wheels, Sport Pack, Touring Pack and air conditioning.
In addition, the £41,950 Exige S RGB gets the Performance Pack. That consists of 308 mm front discs with AP Racing four-piston calipers, uprated front and rear brake pads, full length roof scoop, variable traction control, launch control and an uprated clutch plate and cover.
The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition will be available from September 2010.
End of Exige in Europe?
It looks like the Lotus range in Europe could be decimated at the end of 2010. The reason is that the Toyota-sourced 1.8 litre engine, used in the Elise and Exige, is not compliant with Euro 5 emissions regulations.
That may surprise some people because, despite being quick cars, they have fairly good fuel economy and their carbon dioxide levels aren’t too awful. For example, the normally aspirated Elise R will do 34.4 mpg (8.2 l/100 km) on the combined cycle while producing 196 g/km of CO2.
But none of that matters, because Euro 5 focuses only on permitted amounts of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter in exhaust gasses. The Euro 5 standard came into force across the European Union for newly-launched models in September 2009, and will apply to all cars on sale (regardless of their original introduction dates) from January 2011.
Consequently, production of the European versions of the Elise R, Elise SC, Exige S and Exige Cup 260 will have to end. However, Lotus is keen to stress that manufacture will continue for other markets. So what does that leave for Europe? The answer is no Exige models and only one Elise - the recently introduced ‘base’ variant with its Euro 5 compliant 1.6 litre Toyota engine, which generates 134 bhp (100 kW / 136 PS).
With large gaps in the line-up to be filled, perhaps Lotus will take the opportunity to further divide the engineering philosophies behind the two cars? After all, there have recently been rumours of a V6-powered Exige being developed, probably using the engine from the Evora. By contrast, the Elise could stick to four-cylinder power, with additional adaptations of the 1.6 litre unit.
In the meantime, Lotus has decided to mark the European demise of the 1.8 litre cars with a couple of bespoke versions. The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition carry the initials of Roger Becker, former Director of Vehicle Engineering for Lotus who retired from the Norfolk firm in January after 44 years.
The supercharged Elise SC RGB, with 217 bhp (163 kW / 220 PS), can accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in just 4.6 seconds. That time is eclipsed by the Exige S RGB though, which does the same sprint in half a second less thanks to its 257 bhp (191 kW / 260 PS) engine, as usually found in the Exige Cup 260.
Both will be available in a choice of Aspen White, Starlight Black, Solar Yellow or Carbon Grey paint finishes, with Roger Becker’s signature on the side of the body and a special monochrome Lotus nose badge. The effect is finished off by a numbered plaque in the cabin.
The specification of the Elise SC RGB, which costs £38,550 in the UK, includes ultra lightweight forged alloy wheels, Sport Pack, Touring Pack and air conditioning.
In addition, the £41,950 Exige S RGB gets the Performance Pack. That consists of 308 mm front discs with AP Racing four-piston calipers, uprated front and rear brake pads, full length roof scoop, variable traction control, launch control and an uprated clutch plate and cover.
The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition will be available from September 2010.
That may surprise some people because, despite being quick cars, they have fairly good fuel economy and their carbon dioxide levels aren’t too awful. For example, the normally aspirated Elise R will do 34.4 mpg (8.2 l/100 km) on the combined cycle while producing 196 g/km of CO2.
But none of that matters, because Euro 5 focuses only on permitted amounts of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter in exhaust gasses. The Euro 5 standard came into force across the European Union for newly-launched models in September 2009, and will apply to all cars on sale (regardless of their original introduction dates) from January 2011.
Consequently, production of the European versions of the Elise R, Elise SC, Exige S and Exige Cup 260 will have to end. However, Lotus is keen to stress that manufacture will continue for other markets. So what does that leave for Europe? The answer is no Exige models and only one Elise - the recently introduced ‘base’ variant with its Euro 5 compliant 1.6 litre Toyota engine, which generates 134 bhp (100 kW / 136 PS).
With large gaps in the line-up to be filled, perhaps Lotus will take the opportunity to further divide the engineering philosophies behind the two cars? After all, there have recently been rumours of a V6-powered Exige being developed, probably using the engine from the Evora. By contrast, the Elise could stick to four-cylinder power, with additional adaptations of the 1.6 litre unit.
In the meantime, Lotus has decided to mark the European demise of the 1.8 litre cars with a couple of bespoke versions. The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition carry the initials of Roger Becker, former Director of Vehicle Engineering for Lotus who retired from the Norfolk firm in January after 44 years.
The supercharged Elise SC RGB, with 217 bhp (163 kW / 220 PS), can accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in just 4.6 seconds. That time is eclipsed by the Exige S RGB though, which does the same sprint in half a second less thanks to its 257 bhp (191 kW / 260 PS) engine, as usually found in the Exige Cup 260.
Both will be available in a choice of Aspen White, Starlight Black, Solar Yellow or Carbon Grey paint finishes, with Roger Becker’s signature on the side of the body and a special monochrome Lotus nose badge. The effect is finished off by a numbered plaque in the cabin.
The specification of the Elise SC RGB, which costs £38,550 in the UK, includes ultra lightweight forged alloy wheels, Sport Pack, Touring Pack and air conditioning.
In addition, the £41,950 Exige S RGB gets the Performance Pack. That consists of 308 mm front discs with AP Racing four-piston calipers, uprated front and rear brake pads, full length roof scoop, variable traction control, launch control and an uprated clutch plate and cover.
The Elise SC RGB Special Edition and Exige S RGB Special Edition will be available from September 2010.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Nissan Qashqai Features
Built on an all-new platform, the Qashqai went on sale in February 2007, and Nissan targeted more than 100,000 sales per year.Nissan said the car, named after the nomadic Qashqai tribe in Iran, would cater to those buyers who want a more dynamic design, but are not attracted to the large, aggressive nature of a sport utility vehicle.The car slots below the X-Trail in the Nissan range and
2010 Audi A5 Information
The Audi A5 is an executive or mid-size car produced by the German automobile manufacturer Audi since 2007. It is essentially the two-door coupé and cabriolet versions of the fourth generation A4 (B8) saloon and Avant.2010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A52010 Audi A5All Review videos and
2010 Audi A4 Electric technology
Audi is planning an alliance with the Japanese electronic giant Sanyo to develop a pilot hybrid electric project for the Volkswagen Group. The alliance could result in Sanyo batteries and other electronic components being used in future models of the Volkswagen group2010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi A42010 Audi
2010 Audi A3 clean diesel
The A3 2.0 TDI clean diesel is a version of Audi's A3 2.0 TDI for the North American market, making it the second Audi TDI vehicle sold in North America, following the Audi Q7 TDI in 2008.It is a FWD vehicle with S-tronic transmission with Hill-hold assist, Sirius satellite radio, Leather seats and steering wheel, Auxiliary audio input, Dual-zone climate control, 17 in (431.8 mm) alloy wheels.The
2010 Kia Forte Koup Driving functions
* 156 hp (116 kW) turbocharged 4-cylinder * All-Wheel Drive (AWD) * GDI ( Gasoline Direct Injection) * 6-speed Automatic Transmission with paddle shifters mounted in the steering wheel2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte Koup2010 Kia Forte
2010 Lexus LS Hybrid Awards
Notable examples of awards received by the Lexus LS include World Car of the Year (2007 WCOTY), International Car of the Year (2007 ICOTY), Japan Car of the Year (2006–2007 JCOTY),Canadian Car of the Year, Wheels Car of the Year, and Top Gear Limousine of the Year.The Lexus LS has been the highest-rated luxury car in Automobile Magazine, Car and Driver, Consumer Reports, Fleet World, and
SLS AMG written off
As reported on Russia Today, this is probably the first Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG to be written off. It was involved in a head-on collision in Moscow, being driven by a young woman at the time. The SLS AMG costs £157,500 in the UK.
SLS AMG written off
As reported on Russia Today, this is probably the first Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG to be written off. It was involved in a head-on collision in Moscow, being driven by a young woman at the time. The SLS AMG costs £157,500 in the UK.
BTCC season mid-point
Following this weekend’s round at Croft, the 2010 British Touring Car Championship season is already at its mid-point.
Going into the seven-week summer break, the top five drivers are separated by only 27 points, which is great news for fans. Honda Racing’s Matt Neal heads the table, just ahead of archrival Jason Plato. Neal’s team mate, Gordon Shedden, has propelled himself into third slot, following victories in the first two Croft races - his first BTCC wins since Oulton Park way back in July 2008.
Series organisers will have been pleased with the result in race three at Croft, because it saw the maiden victory of a car powered by TOCA’s Next Generation Touring Car turbocharged engine. Andrew Jordan lead from pole to flag in his Pirtek Racing Vauxhall Vectra, helped by a first corner slide by second-place Tom Onslow-Cole which backed the field up. Plato in his Chevrolet Cruze then mounted a challenge for the lead, but a puncture put paid to his efforts.
Steven Kane, driving a BMW 320si, gave an impressive performance, starting from 19th on the grid but eventually finishing third. That result means Kane has maintained his run of achieving a podium finish at every round so far this season.
British Touring Car Championship standings after fifteen races:
Pos. / Driver / Car / Points
01 / Matt Neal / Honda Civic / 119
02 / Jason Plato / Chevrolet Cruze / 111
03 / Gordon Shedden / Honda Civic / 100
04 / Tom Onslow-Cole / Ford Focus / 97
05 / Steven Kane / BMW 320si / 92
06 / Mat Jackson / BMW 320si / 79
07 / Paul O'Neill / Honda Integra / 79
08 / Robert Collard / BMW 320si / 67
09 / Tom Chilton / Ford Focus / 60
10 / Andrew Jordan / Vauxhall Vectra / 51
11 / Tom Boardman / Seat Leon / 40
12 / Fabrizio Giovanardi / Vauxhall Vectra / 38
13 / Alex MacDowell / Chevrolet Cruze / 35
14 / James Nash / Vauxhall Vectra / 30
15 / Philip Glew / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
16 / David Pinckney / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
17 / Daniel Lloyd / Vauxhall Vectra / 7
18 / Andy Neate / BMW 320si / 4
19 / John George / Honda Integra / 2
20 / Martin Johnson / Vauxhall Astra Coupe / 2
21 / Matt Hamilton / Honda Civic / 2
22 / Martin Depper / BMW 320si / 0
23 / Arthur Forster / BMW 320si / 0
24 / Lea Wood / Honda Integra / 0
25 / Shaun Hollamby / Volkswagen Golf / 0
Going into the seven-week summer break, the top five drivers are separated by only 27 points, which is great news for fans. Honda Racing’s Matt Neal heads the table, just ahead of archrival Jason Plato. Neal’s team mate, Gordon Shedden, has propelled himself into third slot, following victories in the first two Croft races - his first BTCC wins since Oulton Park way back in July 2008.
Series organisers will have been pleased with the result in race three at Croft, because it saw the maiden victory of a car powered by TOCA’s Next Generation Touring Car turbocharged engine. Andrew Jordan lead from pole to flag in his Pirtek Racing Vauxhall Vectra, helped by a first corner slide by second-place Tom Onslow-Cole which backed the field up. Plato in his Chevrolet Cruze then mounted a challenge for the lead, but a puncture put paid to his efforts.
Steven Kane, driving a BMW 320si, gave an impressive performance, starting from 19th on the grid but eventually finishing third. That result means Kane has maintained his run of achieving a podium finish at every round so far this season.
British Touring Car Championship standings after fifteen races:
Pos. / Driver / Car / Points
01 / Matt Neal / Honda Civic / 119
02 / Jason Plato / Chevrolet Cruze / 111
03 / Gordon Shedden / Honda Civic / 100
04 / Tom Onslow-Cole / Ford Focus / 97
05 / Steven Kane / BMW 320si / 92
06 / Mat Jackson / BMW 320si / 79
07 / Paul O'Neill / Honda Integra / 79
08 / Robert Collard / BMW 320si / 67
09 / Tom Chilton / Ford Focus / 60
10 / Andrew Jordan / Vauxhall Vectra / 51
11 / Tom Boardman / Seat Leon / 40
12 / Fabrizio Giovanardi / Vauxhall Vectra / 38
13 / Alex MacDowell / Chevrolet Cruze / 35
14 / James Nash / Vauxhall Vectra / 30
15 / Philip Glew / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
16 / David Pinckney / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
17 / Daniel Lloyd / Vauxhall Vectra / 7
18 / Andy Neate / BMW 320si / 4
19 / John George / Honda Integra / 2
20 / Martin Johnson / Vauxhall Astra Coupe / 2
21 / Matt Hamilton / Honda Civic / 2
22 / Martin Depper / BMW 320si / 0
23 / Arthur Forster / BMW 320si / 0
24 / Lea Wood / Honda Integra / 0
25 / Shaun Hollamby / Volkswagen Golf / 0
BTCC season mid-point
Following this weekend’s round at Croft, the 2010 British Touring Car Championship season is already at its mid-point.
Going into the seven-week summer break, the top five drivers are separated by only 27 points, which is great news for fans. Honda Racing’s Matt Neal heads the table, just ahead of archrival Jason Plato. Neal’s team mate, Gordon Shedden, has propelled himself into third slot, following victories in the first two Croft races - his first BTCC wins since Oulton Park way back in July 2008.
Series organisers will have been pleased with the result in race three at Croft, because it saw the maiden victory of a car powered by TOCA’s Next Generation Touring Car turbocharged engine. Andrew Jordan lead from pole to flag in his Pirtek Racing Vauxhall Vectra, helped by a first corner slide by second-place Tom Onslow-Cole which backed the field up. Plato in his Chevrolet Cruze then mounted a challenge for the lead, but a puncture put paid to his efforts.
Steven Kane, driving a BMW 320si, gave an impressive performance, starting from 19th on the grid but eventually finishing third. That result means Kane has maintained his run of achieving a podium finish at every round so far this season.
British Touring Car Championship standings after fifteen races:
Pos. / Driver / Car / Points
01 / Matt Neal / Honda Civic / 119
02 / Jason Plato / Chevrolet Cruze / 111
03 / Gordon Shedden / Honda Civic / 100
04 / Tom Onslow-Cole / Ford Focus / 97
05 / Steven Kane / BMW 320si / 92
06 / Mat Jackson / BMW 320si / 79
07 / Paul O'Neill / Honda Integra / 79
08 / Robert Collard / BMW 320si / 67
09 / Tom Chilton / Ford Focus / 60
10 / Andrew Jordan / Vauxhall Vectra / 51
11 / Tom Boardman / Seat Leon / 40
12 / Fabrizio Giovanardi / Vauxhall Vectra / 38
13 / Alex MacDowell / Chevrolet Cruze / 35
14 / James Nash / Vauxhall Vectra / 30
15 / Philip Glew / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
16 / David Pinckney / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
17 / Daniel Lloyd / Vauxhall Vectra / 7
18 / Andy Neate / BMW 320si / 4
19 / John George / Honda Integra / 2
20 / Martin Johnson / Vauxhall Astra Coupe / 2
21 / Matt Hamilton / Honda Civic / 2
22 / Martin Depper / BMW 320si / 0
23 / Arthur Forster / BMW 320si / 0
24 / Lea Wood / Honda Integra / 0
25 / Shaun Hollamby / Volkswagen Golf / 0
Going into the seven-week summer break, the top five drivers are separated by only 27 points, which is great news for fans. Honda Racing’s Matt Neal heads the table, just ahead of archrival Jason Plato. Neal’s team mate, Gordon Shedden, has propelled himself into third slot, following victories in the first two Croft races - his first BTCC wins since Oulton Park way back in July 2008.
Series organisers will have been pleased with the result in race three at Croft, because it saw the maiden victory of a car powered by TOCA’s Next Generation Touring Car turbocharged engine. Andrew Jordan lead from pole to flag in his Pirtek Racing Vauxhall Vectra, helped by a first corner slide by second-place Tom Onslow-Cole which backed the field up. Plato in his Chevrolet Cruze then mounted a challenge for the lead, but a puncture put paid to his efforts.
Steven Kane, driving a BMW 320si, gave an impressive performance, starting from 19th on the grid but eventually finishing third. That result means Kane has maintained his run of achieving a podium finish at every round so far this season.
British Touring Car Championship standings after fifteen races:
Pos. / Driver / Car / Points
01 / Matt Neal / Honda Civic / 119
02 / Jason Plato / Chevrolet Cruze / 111
03 / Gordon Shedden / Honda Civic / 100
04 / Tom Onslow-Cole / Ford Focus / 97
05 / Steven Kane / BMW 320si / 92
06 / Mat Jackson / BMW 320si / 79
07 / Paul O'Neill / Honda Integra / 79
08 / Robert Collard / BMW 320si / 67
09 / Tom Chilton / Ford Focus / 60
10 / Andrew Jordan / Vauxhall Vectra / 51
11 / Tom Boardman / Seat Leon / 40
12 / Fabrizio Giovanardi / Vauxhall Vectra / 38
13 / Alex MacDowell / Chevrolet Cruze / 35
14 / James Nash / Vauxhall Vectra / 30
15 / Philip Glew / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
16 / David Pinckney / Vauxhall Vectra / 9
17 / Daniel Lloyd / Vauxhall Vectra / 7
18 / Andy Neate / BMW 320si / 4
19 / John George / Honda Integra / 2
20 / Martin Johnson / Vauxhall Astra Coupe / 2
21 / Matt Hamilton / Honda Civic / 2
22 / Martin Depper / BMW 320si / 0
23 / Arthur Forster / BMW 320si / 0
24 / Lea Wood / Honda Integra / 0
25 / Shaun Hollamby / Volkswagen Golf / 0
Leon Cupra R arrives
It used to be that 200 bhp was thought the limit for front-wheel drive cars. Any more would just mean the driver became too well acquainted with their local tyre supplier, before the inevitable torque-steer induced crash into a hedge.
But trick suspension designs and traction control systems now mean that manufacturers are prepared to push ever increasing power levels through the front wheels, the 345 bhp (257 kW / 350 PS) Ford Focus RS500 demonstrating what’s possible.
Seat must have confidence in the chassis of its Leon, because it has just announced that the 261 bhp (195 kW / 265 PS) Cupra R will be offered in the UK. Thanks to a modified ECU and increased maximum turbo pressure, its 2.0 litre TSI engine has 25 bhp (18 kW / 25 PS) more than the ‘standard’ Leon Cupra. The extra power means the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) time is reduced by 0.2 seconds to 6.2 seconds, while top speed has been limited to 155 mph (250 km/h).
The Cupra R has been a while coming though, as it was first revealed in September 2009 at the Frankfurt Motor Show. And now it’s here it will be rather exclusive, with Seat limiting UK sales to around 500 each year. However, with a price tag of £25,205, that volume will probably be enough to satisfy demand.
Features distinguishing the Cupra R are bigger brake discs, plenty of ‘R’ badges and 19” alloy wheels with ultra-low profile 235/35 tyres. There’s also an extended rear spoiler, twin exhaust pipes that exit through the centre of the diffuser and moulded front seat backs that complement the rest of the very black interior.
Controlling the extra power is XDS, the electronic system used across various Volkswagen Group models. It uses the anti-lock brakes to imitate the action of a mechanical limited slip differential, applying braking force to a slipping wheel to improve grip and limit understeer. The Cupra R also gets ESP stability control, TCS traction control and EBA emergency braking assistance to help keep it on the tarmac.
If the thought of 261 bhp and front wheel drive doesn’t appeal, the same engine is available in the Audi S3. It manages to be slightly quicker than the Seat, thanks to its quattro all-wheel drive, but UK prices start at £30,510 for the five-door Sportback version.
But trick suspension designs and traction control systems now mean that manufacturers are prepared to push ever increasing power levels through the front wheels, the 345 bhp (257 kW / 350 PS) Ford Focus RS500 demonstrating what’s possible.
Seat must have confidence in the chassis of its Leon, because it has just announced that the 261 bhp (195 kW / 265 PS) Cupra R will be offered in the UK. Thanks to a modified ECU and increased maximum turbo pressure, its 2.0 litre TSI engine has 25 bhp (18 kW / 25 PS) more than the ‘standard’ Leon Cupra. The extra power means the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) time is reduced by 0.2 seconds to 6.2 seconds, while top speed has been limited to 155 mph (250 km/h).
The Cupra R has been a while coming though, as it was first revealed in September 2009 at the Frankfurt Motor Show. And now it’s here it will be rather exclusive, with Seat limiting UK sales to around 500 each year. However, with a price tag of £25,205, that volume will probably be enough to satisfy demand.
Features distinguishing the Cupra R are bigger brake discs, plenty of ‘R’ badges and 19” alloy wheels with ultra-low profile 235/35 tyres. There’s also an extended rear spoiler, twin exhaust pipes that exit through the centre of the diffuser and moulded front seat backs that complement the rest of the very black interior.
Controlling the extra power is XDS, the electronic system used across various Volkswagen Group models. It uses the anti-lock brakes to imitate the action of a mechanical limited slip differential, applying braking force to a slipping wheel to improve grip and limit understeer. The Cupra R also gets ESP stability control, TCS traction control and EBA emergency braking assistance to help keep it on the tarmac.
If the thought of 261 bhp and front wheel drive doesn’t appeal, the same engine is available in the Audi S3. It manages to be slightly quicker than the Seat, thanks to its quattro all-wheel drive, but UK prices start at £30,510 for the five-door Sportback version.
Leon Cupra R arrives
It used to be that 200 bhp was thought the limit for front-wheel drive cars. Any more would just mean the driver became too well acquainted with their local tyre supplier, before the inevitable torque-steer induced crash into a hedge.
But trick suspension designs and traction control systems now mean that manufacturers are prepared to push ever increasing power levels through the front wheels, the 345 bhp (257 kW / 350 PS) Ford Focus RS500 demonstrating what’s possible.
Seat must have confidence in the chassis of its Leon, because it has just announced that the 261 bhp (195 kW / 265 PS) Cupra R will be offered in the UK. Thanks to a modified ECU and increased maximum turbo pressure, its 2.0 litre TSI engine has 25 bhp (18 kW / 25 PS) more than the ‘standard’ Leon Cupra. The extra power means the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) time is reduced by 0.2 seconds to 6.2 seconds, while top speed has been limited to 155 mph (250 km/h).
The Cupra R has been a while coming though, as it was first revealed in September 2009 at the Frankfurt Motor Show. And now it’s here it will be rather exclusive, with Seat limiting UK sales to around 500 each year. However, with a price tag of £25,205, that volume will probably be enough to satisfy demand.
Features distinguishing the Cupra R are bigger brake discs, plenty of ‘R’ badges and 19” alloy wheels with ultra-low profile 235/35 tyres. There’s also an extended rear spoiler, twin exhaust pipes that exit through the centre of the diffuser and moulded front seat backs that complement the rest of the very black interior.
Controlling the extra power is XDS, the electronic system used across various Volkswagen Group models. It uses the anti-lock brakes to imitate the action of a mechanical limited slip differential, applying braking force to a slipping wheel to improve grip and limit understeer. The Cupra R also gets ESP stability control, TCS traction control and EBA emergency braking assistance to help keep it on the tarmac.
If the thought of 261 bhp and front wheel drive doesn’t appeal, the same engine is available in the Audi S3. It manages to be slightly quicker than the Seat, thanks to its quattro all-wheel drive, but UK prices start at £30,510 for the five-door Sportback version.
But trick suspension designs and traction control systems now mean that manufacturers are prepared to push ever increasing power levels through the front wheels, the 345 bhp (257 kW / 350 PS) Ford Focus RS500 demonstrating what’s possible.
Seat must have confidence in the chassis of its Leon, because it has just announced that the 261 bhp (195 kW / 265 PS) Cupra R will be offered in the UK. Thanks to a modified ECU and increased maximum turbo pressure, its 2.0 litre TSI engine has 25 bhp (18 kW / 25 PS) more than the ‘standard’ Leon Cupra. The extra power means the 0-62 mph (100 km/h) time is reduced by 0.2 seconds to 6.2 seconds, while top speed has been limited to 155 mph (250 km/h).
The Cupra R has been a while coming though, as it was first revealed in September 2009 at the Frankfurt Motor Show. And now it’s here it will be rather exclusive, with Seat limiting UK sales to around 500 each year. However, with a price tag of £25,205, that volume will probably be enough to satisfy demand.
Features distinguishing the Cupra R are bigger brake discs, plenty of ‘R’ badges and 19” alloy wheels with ultra-low profile 235/35 tyres. There’s also an extended rear spoiler, twin exhaust pipes that exit through the centre of the diffuser and moulded front seat backs that complement the rest of the very black interior.
Controlling the extra power is XDS, the electronic system used across various Volkswagen Group models. It uses the anti-lock brakes to imitate the action of a mechanical limited slip differential, applying braking force to a slipping wheel to improve grip and limit understeer. The Cupra R also gets ESP stability control, TCS traction control and EBA emergency braking assistance to help keep it on the tarmac.
If the thought of 261 bhp and front wheel drive doesn’t appeal, the same engine is available in the Audi S3. It manages to be slightly quicker than the Seat, thanks to its quattro all-wheel drive, but UK prices start at £30,510 for the five-door Sportback version.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Chevrolet Camaro Sales
Chevrolet started taking pre-orders for the 2010 Camaro on October 13, 2008, however sales to rentals and orders made after the pre-order period, were processed before many of the pre-orders. The LS starts at US$22,245 while the SS starts at US$30,245. By the end of 2008, General Motors confirmed more than 10,000 advanced orders and that all pre-orders would be completed by October 2009.Chevrolet
2010 Dodge Viper SRT10 review
For the 2003 SEMA show, Chrysler displayed a highly tuned Viper SRT-10 in coupe form. The vehicle's name comes from the carbon fiber used to reduce the weight by 150 lbs (total down to 3200 lbs).2010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010 Dodge Viper SRT102010
2011 Honda Odyssey information
Honda showcased the 2011 Odyssey in concept in early 2010. The 2011 concept was shown at the Chicago Auto Show.Honda took the wraps off the 2011 redesign on June 17, 2010. The new model shows a much more agressive stanse with a lower roofline and wider body. The side is characterized by the lightning bolt belt line. Styling brings the minivan in line with Honda's new 2010/2011 products.Inside the
2010 Impreza WRX STI
Available for the UK market only, the Cosworth Impreza STI CS400 was announced in late May 2010. Only 75 units built, the STI CS400 is powered by a 400 PS 2.5 liter turbocharged engine which has Cosworth engineered forged connecting rods, racing pistons, heavy duty cylinder head studs, multi-layered head gasket, and high pressure oil pump. The ECU had been remapped, and the new compressor design
2010 Subaru Tribeca Awards
The Tribeca won best interior of the year by Ward's Auto, a benchmark agent similar to JD Power, but more subjective. Also, it was considered Most Innovative Concept at the 2004 Detroit Auto Show.The Tribeca scored well on Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests. It earned a "Top Safety Pick" ranking.2010 Subaru Tribeca2010 Subaru Tribeca2010 Subaru Tribeca2010 Subaru Tribeca2010
BMW Alpina B7 view
BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7BMW Alpina B7All Review videos and more of:• Infiniti• Mitsubishi• Aston Martin• Isuzu• Nissan• Audi• Jaguar • Pontiac• Bentley• Jeep• Porsche• BMW• Kia• Rolls Royce• Buick• Lamborghini• Saab• Cadillac• Land Rover• Saturn• Chevrolet• Lexus•
BMW Z4 information
The BMW Z4 is a rear-wheel drive sports car by the German Car maker BMW. It follows a line of past BMW roadsters such as the BMW Z1, BMW 507, BMW Z8, and the BMW Z3. The Z4 replaces the Z3. First generation production started in 2002 at BMW's Spartanburg, South Carolina plant, with production of both roadster and coupe forms.BMW Z4BMW Z4BMW Z4When debuted, it won Automobile Magazine "Design of
2010 BMW 3 Series Convertible Future models
The next full revision of the 3 Series is expected in for the 2012 model year, and will feature improved aerodynamics, lightweight materials and the option of smaller displacement engines. A hybrid version is still under consideration.2010 BMW 3 Series Convertible2010 BMW 3 Series Convertible2010 BMW 3 Series Convertible2010 BMW 3 Series Convertible2010 BMW 3 Series Convertible2010 BMW 3 Series
Clio Gordini 200
Blimey, a Renault Clio for almost £20,000? That’s what Renault is charging for the new Clio Gordini 200. Limited to 500 examples for the UK, the exact price is £19,650 - a hefty premium over the £17,710 Clio Renaultsport 200, the car on which the Gordini is based.
Except the Renaultsport 200 can be had for much less, with online brokers such as Broadspeed and Carfile knocking at least £2,000 off list, which indicates what kind of discounts are available. Whether such reductions will also apply to the limited edition Gordini remains to be seen.
So, what do you get with the Gordini to justify the extra cost? There’s dark grey leather with blue details, a Bluetooth hands-free phone system, heated and electrically folding door mirrors, cornering lights and special paint (Malta Blue metallic, Pearl Black metallic or Glacier White). Tick all of those on the options list when specifying a Renaultsport 200 and the pre-discount price shoots up to £20,445, so perhaps the Gordini doesn’t look such bad value after all. That is, of course, provided those extras were wanted in the first place.
Other differences are mainly cosmetic, and include a gloss black centre section plus white F1-style ‘blade’ on the front bumper, white door mirrors, 17” Gordini alloy wheels and ‘Gordini Series’ badging. The effect is completed by the signature Gordini stripes, although these can be deleted by request. Apart from the leather trim, the interior features a white rev counter, exclusive steering wheel and a plaque that will show the build number of the car.
Technically, the Gordini is the same as its Renaultsport sibling. That means a 2.0 litre petrol engine producing 197 bhp (147 kW / 200 PS) which will accelerate the Clio from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in 6.9 seconds. Top speed is 141 mph (225 km/h).
For even sportier handling, customers can choose the optional £410 Cup chassis. It includes a 7mm lower ride height, springs that are stiffer by 27% at the front and 30% at the rear, 45% firmer dampers, a quicker steering rack and red Brembo brake calipers.
Buyers after similar performance might also want to consider the Mini Cooper S, Vauxhall Corsa VXR / Opel Corsa OPC, any one of the Volkswagen Polo GTI / Skoda Fabia vRS / Seat Ibiza SC Cupra trio or the forthcoming Abarth Punto Evo Esseesse. For anyone wanting an even faster supermini there’s the £21,670 Mini John Cooper Works, which does the 0-62 mph sprint in 6.5 seconds and will go on to 148 mph (238 km/h).
However, it may still be the case that the biggest threat to the Clio Gordini 200, which is available to order now for delivery from July, is a heavily discounted Clio Renaultsport 200.
Except the Renaultsport 200 can be had for much less, with online brokers such as Broadspeed and Carfile knocking at least £2,000 off list, which indicates what kind of discounts are available. Whether such reductions will also apply to the limited edition Gordini remains to be seen.
So, what do you get with the Gordini to justify the extra cost? There’s dark grey leather with blue details, a Bluetooth hands-free phone system, heated and electrically folding door mirrors, cornering lights and special paint (Malta Blue metallic, Pearl Black metallic or Glacier White). Tick all of those on the options list when specifying a Renaultsport 200 and the pre-discount price shoots up to £20,445, so perhaps the Gordini doesn’t look such bad value after all. That is, of course, provided those extras were wanted in the first place.
Other differences are mainly cosmetic, and include a gloss black centre section plus white F1-style ‘blade’ on the front bumper, white door mirrors, 17” Gordini alloy wheels and ‘Gordini Series’ badging. The effect is completed by the signature Gordini stripes, although these can be deleted by request. Apart from the leather trim, the interior features a white rev counter, exclusive steering wheel and a plaque that will show the build number of the car.
Technically, the Gordini is the same as its Renaultsport sibling. That means a 2.0 litre petrol engine producing 197 bhp (147 kW / 200 PS) which will accelerate the Clio from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in 6.9 seconds. Top speed is 141 mph (225 km/h).
For even sportier handling, customers can choose the optional £410 Cup chassis. It includes a 7mm lower ride height, springs that are stiffer by 27% at the front and 30% at the rear, 45% firmer dampers, a quicker steering rack and red Brembo brake calipers.
Buyers after similar performance might also want to consider the Mini Cooper S, Vauxhall Corsa VXR / Opel Corsa OPC, any one of the Volkswagen Polo GTI / Skoda Fabia vRS / Seat Ibiza SC Cupra trio or the forthcoming Abarth Punto Evo Esseesse. For anyone wanting an even faster supermini there’s the £21,670 Mini John Cooper Works, which does the 0-62 mph sprint in 6.5 seconds and will go on to 148 mph (238 km/h).
However, it may still be the case that the biggest threat to the Clio Gordini 200, which is available to order now for delivery from July, is a heavily discounted Clio Renaultsport 200.
Clio Gordini 200
Blimey, a Renault Clio for almost £20,000? That’s what Renault is charging for the new Clio Gordini 200. Limited to 500 examples for the UK, the exact price is £19,650 - a hefty premium over the £17,710 Clio Renaultsport 200, the car on which the Gordini is based.
Except the Renaultsport 200 can be had for much less, with online brokers such as Broadspeed and Carfile knocking at least £2,000 off list, which indicates what kind of discounts are available. Whether such reductions will also apply to the limited edition Gordini remains to be seen.
So, what do you get with the Gordini to justify the extra cost? There’s dark grey leather with blue details, a Bluetooth hands-free phone system, heated and electrically folding door mirrors, cornering lights and special paint (Malta Blue metallic, Pearl Black metallic or Glacier White). Tick all of those on the options list when specifying a Renaultsport 200 and the pre-discount price shoots up to £20,445, so perhaps the Gordini doesn’t look such bad value after all. That is, of course, provided those extras were wanted in the first place.
Other differences are mainly cosmetic, and include a gloss black centre section plus white F1-style ‘blade’ on the front bumper, white door mirrors, 17” Gordini alloy wheels and ‘Gordini Series’ badging. The effect is completed by the signature Gordini stripes, although these can be deleted by request. Apart from the leather trim, the interior features a white rev counter, exclusive steering wheel and a plaque that will show the build number of the car.
Technically, the Gordini is the same as its Renaultsport sibling. That means a 2.0 litre petrol engine producing 197 bhp (147 kW / 200 PS) which will accelerate the Clio from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in 6.9 seconds. Top speed is 141 mph (225 km/h).
For even sportier handling, customers can choose the optional £410 Cup chassis. It includes a 7mm lower ride height, springs that are stiffer by 27% at the front and 30% at the rear, 45% firmer dampers, a quicker steering rack and red Brembo brake calipers.
Buyers after similar performance might also want to consider the Mini Cooper S, Vauxhall Corsa VXR / Opel Corsa OPC, any one of the Volkswagen Polo GTI / Skoda Fabia vRS / Seat Ibiza SC Cupra trio or the forthcoming Abarth Punto Evo Esseesse. For anyone wanting an even faster supermini there’s the £21,670 Mini John Cooper Works, which does the 0-62 mph sprint in 6.5 seconds and will go on to 148 mph (238 km/h).
However, it may still be the case that the biggest threat to the Clio Gordini 200, which is available to order now for delivery from July, is a heavily discounted Clio Renaultsport 200.
Except the Renaultsport 200 can be had for much less, with online brokers such as Broadspeed and Carfile knocking at least £2,000 off list, which indicates what kind of discounts are available. Whether such reductions will also apply to the limited edition Gordini remains to be seen.
So, what do you get with the Gordini to justify the extra cost? There’s dark grey leather with blue details, a Bluetooth hands-free phone system, heated and electrically folding door mirrors, cornering lights and special paint (Malta Blue metallic, Pearl Black metallic or Glacier White). Tick all of those on the options list when specifying a Renaultsport 200 and the pre-discount price shoots up to £20,445, so perhaps the Gordini doesn’t look such bad value after all. That is, of course, provided those extras were wanted in the first place.
Other differences are mainly cosmetic, and include a gloss black centre section plus white F1-style ‘blade’ on the front bumper, white door mirrors, 17” Gordini alloy wheels and ‘Gordini Series’ badging. The effect is completed by the signature Gordini stripes, although these can be deleted by request. Apart from the leather trim, the interior features a white rev counter, exclusive steering wheel and a plaque that will show the build number of the car.
Technically, the Gordini is the same as its Renaultsport sibling. That means a 2.0 litre petrol engine producing 197 bhp (147 kW / 200 PS) which will accelerate the Clio from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in 6.9 seconds. Top speed is 141 mph (225 km/h).
For even sportier handling, customers can choose the optional £410 Cup chassis. It includes a 7mm lower ride height, springs that are stiffer by 27% at the front and 30% at the rear, 45% firmer dampers, a quicker steering rack and red Brembo brake calipers.
Buyers after similar performance might also want to consider the Mini Cooper S, Vauxhall Corsa VXR / Opel Corsa OPC, any one of the Volkswagen Polo GTI / Skoda Fabia vRS / Seat Ibiza SC Cupra trio or the forthcoming Abarth Punto Evo Esseesse. For anyone wanting an even faster supermini there’s the £21,670 Mini John Cooper Works, which does the 0-62 mph sprint in 6.5 seconds and will go on to 148 mph (238 km/h).
However, it may still be the case that the biggest threat to the Clio Gordini 200, which is available to order now for delivery from July, is a heavily discounted Clio Renaultsport 200.
Friday, June 18, 2010
MG Design Centre opens
The slow resurgence of MG at its Birmingham site continues, with the opening of the MG Global Design Centre. Employing a team of twenty designers, the studio will sit alongside parent company SAIC’s European Technical Centre, where almost 300 engineers already work.
But what of vehicle manufacture at the facility? Well, the TF (getting on a bit but great value with UK prices starting at £13,799) continues to be produced there, and assembly of the MG6 hatch is due to begin at the end of 2010.
Meanwhile, MG has decided to rename the internal roads around the Birmingham works, following consultation with fans of the marque. The five names that will be used are Abingdon Avenue, Morris Garages Drive, Octagon Way, Austin Street and Issigonis Road. Funnily enough, BMW Boulevard and John Towers Terrace weren’t chosen.
But what of vehicle manufacture at the facility? Well, the TF (getting on a bit but great value with UK prices starting at £13,799) continues to be produced there, and assembly of the MG6 hatch is due to begin at the end of 2010.
Meanwhile, MG has decided to rename the internal roads around the Birmingham works, following consultation with fans of the marque. The five names that will be used are Abingdon Avenue, Morris Garages Drive, Octagon Way, Austin Street and Issigonis Road. Funnily enough, BMW Boulevard and John Towers Terrace weren’t chosen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)