Sunday, May 30, 2010
2011 Buick Regal Fifth generation
In November 2009, in Los Angeles, GM revealed the model to the North American market, with a launch date of 2nd quarter 2010.In North America, the new Regal will slot just below the LaCrosse, and compete with upscale sedans such as the Acura TSX and Volvo S60. It will debut with just one engine, the 2.4L Ecotec I4 rated at 182 hp. A turbocharged 2.0L Ecotec I4 rated at an estimated 220 hp will be
2010 Buick Enclave Markets
Sales in the United States and Canada began in 2007.In 2008, General Motors began exporting the Enclave to China, to be sold through Shanghai GM's Buick network.The Buick brand has been relaunched in Mexico for the 2010 model year, bringing the Enclave to that market.2010 Buick Enclave2010 Buick Enclave2010 Buick Enclave2010 Buick Enclave2010 Buick Enclave2010 Buick Enclave2010 Buick Enclave2010
2010 Buick LaCrosse Second generation
Arriving as a 2010 model, the new Buick Lacrosse is built upon the mid-size Epsilon II platform, which is also the basis for the Opel Insignia and the 2010 Saab 9-5.The design was based on 2008 Buick Invicta concept, and replaces both the Chinese and North American models. Buick states that the new LaCrosse will be "America's Lexus fighter".With the new 2011 Regal and the coming demise of Lucerne
GSX-R 25th anniversary
The first Suzuki to bear the GSX-R name was the 750F, launched back in 1985. Twenty-five years later, Suzuki has created special editions based on the current GSX-R range to celebrate the anniversary.
Earlier this year saw the arrival of the GSX-R600 and GSX-R750 Limited Editions. Both had blue and white paintwork inspired by earlier versions of the bikes, Yoshimura exhausts and commemorative plaques.
Now it’s the turn of the GSX-R1000 to get the Limited Edition treatment. Like its smaller siblings, it gets engraved Yoshimura exhaust end cans and a numbered plaque, but it also features laser etched wheel rim graphics and a unique colour scheme.
Perhaps confusing 25th and 50th anniversaries, Suzuki has gone for gold and white paint (surely silver would’ve been more appropriate?). Fair enough, except that the gold colour looks suspiciously like brown from the pictures.
That probably won’t put off buyers of the twenty-five examples that’ll be available in the UK, out of a total world-wide production of 1,000. And nor will the price: at £11,125 on the road, customers will be paying a £651 premium over the standard bike for what are - exhaust apart - purely cosmetic changes.
The order book for the GSX-R1000 Limited Edition opens on 1 June 2010 via the Suzuki website.
Earlier this year saw the arrival of the GSX-R600 and GSX-R750 Limited Editions. Both had blue and white paintwork inspired by earlier versions of the bikes, Yoshimura exhausts and commemorative plaques.
Now it’s the turn of the GSX-R1000 to get the Limited Edition treatment. Like its smaller siblings, it gets engraved Yoshimura exhaust end cans and a numbered plaque, but it also features laser etched wheel rim graphics and a unique colour scheme.
Perhaps confusing 25th and 50th anniversaries, Suzuki has gone for gold and white paint (surely silver would’ve been more appropriate?). Fair enough, except that the gold colour looks suspiciously like brown from the pictures.
That probably won’t put off buyers of the twenty-five examples that’ll be available in the UK, out of a total world-wide production of 1,000. And nor will the price: at £11,125 on the road, customers will be paying a £651 premium over the standard bike for what are - exhaust apart - purely cosmetic changes.
The order book for the GSX-R1000 Limited Edition opens on 1 June 2010 via the Suzuki website.
GSX-R 25th anniversary
The first Suzuki to bear the GSX-R name was the 750F, launched back in 1985. Twenty-five years later, Suzuki has created special editions based on the current GSX-R range to celebrate the anniversary.
Earlier this year saw the arrival of the GSX-R600 and GSX-R750 Limited Editions. Both had blue and white paintwork inspired by earlier versions of the bikes, Yoshimura exhausts and commemorative plaques.
Now it’s the turn of the GSX-R1000 to get the Limited Edition treatment. Like its smaller siblings, it gets engraved Yoshimura exhaust end cans and a numbered plaque, but it also features laser etched wheel rim graphics and a unique colour scheme.
Perhaps confusing 25th and 50th anniversaries, Suzuki has gone for gold and white paint (surely silver would’ve been more appropriate?). Fair enough, except that the gold colour looks suspiciously like brown from the pictures.
That probably won’t put off buyers of the twenty-five examples that’ll be available in the UK, out of a total world-wide production of 1,000. And nor will the price: at £11,125 on the road, customers will be paying a £651 premium over the standard bike for what are - exhaust apart - purely cosmetic changes.
The order book for the GSX-R1000 Limited Edition opens on 1 June 2010 via the Suzuki website.
Earlier this year saw the arrival of the GSX-R600 and GSX-R750 Limited Editions. Both had blue and white paintwork inspired by earlier versions of the bikes, Yoshimura exhausts and commemorative plaques.
Now it’s the turn of the GSX-R1000 to get the Limited Edition treatment. Like its smaller siblings, it gets engraved Yoshimura exhaust end cans and a numbered plaque, but it also features laser etched wheel rim graphics and a unique colour scheme.
Perhaps confusing 25th and 50th anniversaries, Suzuki has gone for gold and white paint (surely silver would’ve been more appropriate?). Fair enough, except that the gold colour looks suspiciously like brown from the pictures.
That probably won’t put off buyers of the twenty-five examples that’ll be available in the UK, out of a total world-wide production of 1,000. And nor will the price: at £11,125 on the road, customers will be paying a £651 premium over the standard bike for what are - exhaust apart - purely cosmetic changes.
The order book for the GSX-R1000 Limited Edition opens on 1 June 2010 via the Suzuki website.
2010 Audi A8 Features
* All LED headlights with cornering light, country mode, highway mode, intersection mode, city mode and Adaptive highbeam. * Night vision system with infrared technology and pedestrian recognition * Speed limit display * adaptive cruise control with Stop&go function * Lane departure warning system: Lane Assist * Blind Spot Monitor: Side Assist * Precrash system for front (with full
Audi A3 Marketing
In the Spring of 2005, Audi began a massive alternate reality game to advertise for the A3, known as The Art of the Heist.In February 2010, the A3 TDI was featured in Audi's "Green Car" Super Bowl spot, which highlighted that model's "2010 Green Car of the Year" designation by Green Car Journal.Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3Audi A3All Review
2010 Chevrolet Equinox Skepticism of EPA Fuel Economy Ratings
Several road tests have led to skepticism about the front-drive four-cylinder Equinox's EPA fuel economy ratings. After achieving 18.8 mpg-US (8.0 km/l) in a road test, Edmunds InsideLine stated, "...our testing didn't come close to achieving , even though we're usually within 1 mpg of the EPA combined number." Car and Driver recorded another 18 mpg-US (7.7 km/l) figure and noted its "...fuel
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Ford Gran Torino Popularity
Although muscle cars are very popular today, the Ford Torino has not quite gained the status of many other cars from that era. The 1960s and 1970s Torinos are nowhere near as popular with collectors as its contemporary competitors of the day. Today, a Chevrolet Chevelle or a Plymouth Road Runner commands much greater popularity and value compared to a similarly equipped Torino. Among Ford Motor
2010 Mitsubishi Lancer name
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a family car built by Mitsubishi Motors. It has been known as the Colt Lancer, Dodge/Plymouth Colt, Chrysler Valiant Lancer, Chrysler Lancer, Eagle Summit, Hindustan Lancer, Soueast Lioncel, Mitsubishi Carisma, and Mitsubishi Mirage in various countries at different times, and will be sold as the Galant Fortis in its home market from 2007. It has also been sold as Lancer
2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor origins
Its design origins can be traced back to the Mitsubishi SSU which debuted at the 1999 North American International Auto Show, although the Endeavor does not share the concept's mechanical underpinnings.The prototype was powered by a 305 hp (227 kW) version of the 6A13TT 2.5 liter twin-turbo V6, which directed the power to a full-time all wheel drive system through its INVECS-II five-speed
Tesla Roadster History
The car was officially unveiled to the public on July 19, 2006, in Santa Monica, California, at a 350-person invitation-only event held in Barker Hangar at Santa Monica Airport.The San Francisco International Auto Show, held on November 18–26, 2006, was the Tesla Roadster's first auto show. Tesla Roadsters have been featured in numerous subsequent auto shows, including international shows in Los
2010 Infiniti G37 Coupe
Infiniti debuted the G25 sedan at the 2010 Beijing International Automotive Exhibition along with the Infiniti EX25.The sedan received the 2.5 L V6 VQ25HR producing 235 PS (165 kW) @ 258 N·m .Currently Infiniti hasn't sold the G25 sedan or the EX25 Crossover in any other region except for China.2010 Infiniti G37 Coupe2010 Infiniti G37 Coupe2010 Infiniti G37 Coupe2010 Infiniti G37 Coupe2010
Dodge Challenger Performance 1/4 mile
* 340: 14.8 @ 96 mph (154 km/h) * 340 T/A: 14.51 @ 99.6 mph (160.3 km/h) Auto with 3.55 same car used on all published test * 383 2-barrel: 15.1 @ 96 mph (154 km/h) * 383 Magnum R/T: 14.3 @ 99 mph (159 km/h) * 440 Magnum R/T: 13.8 @ 102 mph (164 km/h) * 440 Six-Pack: 13.4 @ 107 mph (172 km/h) * 426 Hemi: 14.2 @ 108 mph (174 km/h)Dodge ChallengerDodge ChallengerDodge ChallengerDodge
Friday, May 28, 2010
Pontiac Solstice Discontinuation
In April 2009, after GM announced the discontinuation of the Pontiac brand by the end of 2010, CEO Fritz Henderson stated that the Solstice would not continue under another GM brand.Although they considered selling the Wilmington plant and the Solstice/Sky products to an outside business, the Wilmington assembly plant closed in July 2009.In October 2009, the DeLorean Motor Company expressed
Pontiac Cars List
* Pontiac 2+2 (1964-1970) * Pontiac 2000 (1983) * Pontiac 2000 Sunbird (1984) * Pontiac 6000 (1982-1991) * Pontiac Acadian (1976-1987, Canada) * Pontiac Astre (1975-1977; 1973-1977 Canada) * Pontiac Aztek (2001-2005) * Pontiac Bonneville (1957-2005) * Pontiac Catalina (1959-1981) * Pontiac Chieftain (1950-1958) * Pontiac Custom S (1969) * Pontiac De-Lux (1937) * Pontiac
2010 Pontiac G8 Specification levels
The base G8, referred to in Pontiac sales literature as the "G8 Sedan", is available with a 3.6 liter High Feature V6 engine, producing 256 horsepower (191 kW). The only transmission available is a five-speed GM 5L40-E automatic; fuel economy is officially rated at 17 mpg-US (14 L/100 km) city/25 mpg-US (9.4 L/100 km) highway.2010 Pontiac G82010 Pontiac G82010 Pontiac G82010 Pontiac G82010
Thursday, May 27, 2010
London Congestion Charge
London Mayor Boris Johnson has proposed changes to the Congestion Charge.
Good news for drivers is that the Western Extension zone would be abolished, effective from 24 December 2010.
Perhaps not so good is the cost of driving in the remaining Congestion Charge area, which is set to increase. Currently the daily fee is £8 if paid in advance or on the day, or £10 if paid the day after, but both these amounts would increase by £2 under the Mayor’s plans.
To help those who make a habit of forgetting to pay the charge (and consequently earn themselves Penalty Charge Notices, i.e. fines), they’ll be able to register with a proposed new Congestion Charging Auto Pay scheme. Basically it does as the name implies - register a credit or debit card, and it’ll automatically be billed each time the Congestion Charge zone is entered. Under the system the daily charge is reduced to £9, but users will have to pay £10 annually to participate.
A major change that’s being planned - and one which will be important to anyone thinking of buying a car to use in central London - is the scrapping of the Alternative Fuel Discount (AFD), which meant that any vehicle not powered solely by petrol or diesel qualified for a 100% discount on the Congestion Charge.
In its place will be the Greener Vehicle Discount (GVD). This makes sense, since under GVD rules any vehicles (including non-hybrids) that emit 100 g/km or less of CO2 and are Euro 5 compliant will now be eligible for the 100% discount, subject to a £10 annual registration fee.
Cars qualifying for the GVD would include:
However, cars currently eligible for the AFD that wouldn’t meet GVD criteria (and therefore would have to pay the full Congestion Charge) are:
It was a mockery of the AFD that those Lexus models ever qualified. Nevertheless, as a concession to owners of vehicles no longer exempt if the GVD is introduced, the 100% discount will continue for two years until 24 December 2012, provided the car is registered under the AFD scheme before 24 December 2010.
Finally, the current 100% discount for fully electrically propelled vehicles would continue, with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles also being included in this discount category for the first time.
The proposed changes are in the consultation phase at the moment. Anyone with any views on them has to let Transport for London know by 2 August 2010.
Good news for drivers is that the Western Extension zone would be abolished, effective from 24 December 2010.
Perhaps not so good is the cost of driving in the remaining Congestion Charge area, which is set to increase. Currently the daily fee is £8 if paid in advance or on the day, or £10 if paid the day after, but both these amounts would increase by £2 under the Mayor’s plans.
To help those who make a habit of forgetting to pay the charge (and consequently earn themselves Penalty Charge Notices, i.e. fines), they’ll be able to register with a proposed new Congestion Charging Auto Pay scheme. Basically it does as the name implies - register a credit or debit card, and it’ll automatically be billed each time the Congestion Charge zone is entered. Under the system the daily charge is reduced to £9, but users will have to pay £10 annually to participate.
A major change that’s being planned - and one which will be important to anyone thinking of buying a car to use in central London - is the scrapping of the Alternative Fuel Discount (AFD), which meant that any vehicle not powered solely by petrol or diesel qualified for a 100% discount on the Congestion Charge.
In its place will be the Greener Vehicle Discount (GVD). This makes sense, since under GVD rules any vehicles (including non-hybrids) that emit 100 g/km or less of CO2 and are Euro 5 compliant will now be eligible for the 100% discount, subject to a £10 annual registration fee.
Cars qualifying for the GVD would include:
- Audi A3 1.6 TDI 105 Stop Start
- Citroen C3 1.6 HDi 90 Airdream
- Citroen DS3 1.6 HDi 90 Dstyle
- Ford Fiesta 1.6 TDCI Econetic
- Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi 109 Econetic
- Peugeot 207 1.6 HDi 90 Economiqe
- Smart Fortwo 0.8 CDI cabrio and coupe
- SEAT Ibiza 1.4 TDCi Ecomotive
- SEAT Leon 1.6 TDI 105 Ecomotive
- Skoda Fabia Greenline
- Toyota Auris 1.8 VVT-I HSD
- Toyota Prius
- Toyota iQ
- Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CTDi ecoFLEX
- Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TDI BlueMotion
- Volkswagen Golf 1.6 TDI 105 BlueMotion
- Volvo C30 1.6D DRIVe
However, cars currently eligible for the AFD that wouldn’t meet GVD criteria (and therefore would have to pay the full Congestion Charge) are:
- Honda Civic Hybrid saloon (109 g/km CO2)
- Honda CR-Z (117 g/km CO2)
- Honda Insight (101 g/km CO2)
- Lexus GS 450h (179 g/km CO2)
- Lexus LS 600h (218 g/km CO2)
- Lexus RX 450h (148 g/km CO2)
It was a mockery of the AFD that those Lexus models ever qualified. Nevertheless, as a concession to owners of vehicles no longer exempt if the GVD is introduced, the 100% discount will continue for two years until 24 December 2012, provided the car is registered under the AFD scheme before 24 December 2010.
Finally, the current 100% discount for fully electrically propelled vehicles would continue, with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles also being included in this discount category for the first time.
The proposed changes are in the consultation phase at the moment. Anyone with any views on them has to let Transport for London know by 2 August 2010.
London Congestion Charge
London Mayor Boris Johnson has proposed changes to the Congestion Charge.
Good news for drivers is that the Western Extension zone would be abolished, effective from 24 December 2010.
Perhaps not so good is the cost of driving in the remaining Congestion Charge area, which is set to increase. Currently the daily fee is £8 if paid in advance or on the day, or £10 if paid the day after, but both these amounts would increase by £2 under the Mayor’s plans.
To help those who make a habit of forgetting to pay the charge (and consequently earn themselves Penalty Charge Notices, i.e. fines), they’ll be able to register with a proposed new Congestion Charging Auto Pay scheme. Basically it does as the name implies - register a credit or debit card, and it’ll automatically be billed each time the Congestion Charge zone is entered. Under the system the daily charge is reduced to £9, but users will have to pay £10 annually to participate.
A major change that’s being planned - and one which will be important to anyone thinking of buying a car to use in central London - is the scrapping of the Alternative Fuel Discount (AFD), which meant that any vehicle not powered solely by petrol or diesel qualified for a 100% discount on the Congestion Charge.
In its place will be the Greener Vehicle Discount (GVD). This makes sense, since under GVD rules any vehicles (including non-hybrids) that emit 100 g/km or less of CO2 and are Euro 5 compliant will now be eligible for the 100% discount, subject to a £10 annual registration fee.
Cars qualifying for the GVD would include:
However, cars currently eligible for the AFD that wouldn’t meet GVD criteria (and therefore would have to pay the full Congestion Charge) are:
It was a mockery of the AFD that those Lexus models ever qualified. Nevertheless, as a concession to owners of vehicles no longer exempt if the GVD is introduced, the 100% discount will continue for two years until 24 December 2012, provided the car is registered under the AFD scheme before 24 December 2010.
Finally, the current 100% discount for fully electrically propelled vehicles would continue, with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles also being included in this discount category for the first time.
The proposed changes are in the consultation phase at the moment. Anyone with any views on them has to let Transport for London know by 2 August 2010.
Good news for drivers is that the Western Extension zone would be abolished, effective from 24 December 2010.
Perhaps not so good is the cost of driving in the remaining Congestion Charge area, which is set to increase. Currently the daily fee is £8 if paid in advance or on the day, or £10 if paid the day after, but both these amounts would increase by £2 under the Mayor’s plans.
To help those who make a habit of forgetting to pay the charge (and consequently earn themselves Penalty Charge Notices, i.e. fines), they’ll be able to register with a proposed new Congestion Charging Auto Pay scheme. Basically it does as the name implies - register a credit or debit card, and it’ll automatically be billed each time the Congestion Charge zone is entered. Under the system the daily charge is reduced to £9, but users will have to pay £10 annually to participate.
A major change that’s being planned - and one which will be important to anyone thinking of buying a car to use in central London - is the scrapping of the Alternative Fuel Discount (AFD), which meant that any vehicle not powered solely by petrol or diesel qualified for a 100% discount on the Congestion Charge.
In its place will be the Greener Vehicle Discount (GVD). This makes sense, since under GVD rules any vehicles (including non-hybrids) that emit 100 g/km or less of CO2 and are Euro 5 compliant will now be eligible for the 100% discount, subject to a £10 annual registration fee.
Cars qualifying for the GVD would include:
- Audi A3 1.6 TDI 105 Stop Start
- Citroen C3 1.6 HDi 90 Airdream
- Citroen DS3 1.6 HDi 90 Dstyle
- Ford Fiesta 1.6 TDCI Econetic
- Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi 109 Econetic
- Peugeot 207 1.6 HDi 90 Economiqe
- Smart Fortwo 0.8 CDI cabrio and coupe
- SEAT Ibiza 1.4 TDCi Ecomotive
- SEAT Leon 1.6 TDI 105 Ecomotive
- Skoda Fabia Greenline
- Toyota Auris 1.8 VVT-I HSD
- Toyota Prius
- Toyota iQ
- Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CTDi ecoFLEX
- Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TDI BlueMotion
- Volkswagen Golf 1.6 TDI 105 BlueMotion
- Volvo C30 1.6D DRIVe
However, cars currently eligible for the AFD that wouldn’t meet GVD criteria (and therefore would have to pay the full Congestion Charge) are:
- Honda Civic Hybrid saloon (109 g/km CO2)
- Honda CR-Z (117 g/km CO2)
- Honda Insight (101 g/km CO2)
- Lexus GS 450h (179 g/km CO2)
- Lexus LS 600h (218 g/km CO2)
- Lexus RX 450h (148 g/km CO2)
It was a mockery of the AFD that those Lexus models ever qualified. Nevertheless, as a concession to owners of vehicles no longer exempt if the GVD is introduced, the 100% discount will continue for two years until 24 December 2012, provided the car is registered under the AFD scheme before 24 December 2010.
Finally, the current 100% discount for fully electrically propelled vehicles would continue, with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles also being included in this discount category for the first time.
The proposed changes are in the consultation phase at the moment. Anyone with any views on them has to let Transport for London know by 2 August 2010.
Honda Civic Type S debuted
The Type-S variant debuted as a 2007 model and uses the identical drivetrain found in the US and Canadian market 2006+ Honda Civic Si which consists of a 2.0L I4, 197 horsepower (147 kW) i-VTEC engine, 6-speed manual transmission and helical limited-slip differential. The "sport-tuned" suspension is identical to the US-only 2007+ Honda Civic Si sedan with stiffer springs, firmer damping and
Honda S2000 Reviews and awards
The S2000 has received much praise from critics and motoring journalists and has received favourable reviews from such publications as Car and Driver, Car Magazine, the Los Angeles Times, and Road & Track magazine. Among the features highlighted are the high output of the engine, the high redline, the balanced handling, and the smooth gearbox. User surveys have named the S2000 as a favorite for
2011 BMW Z4 First generation
The first-generation BMW Z4 was designated the E85 in roadster form and E86 in coupé form. It was designed by Danish BMW-designer Anders Warming.2011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z42011 BMW Z4All Review videos and more of:• Infiniti• Mitsubishi• Aston Martin• Isuzu• Nissan• Audi• Jaguar •
2010 BMW M3 Notable publication accolades
In 2004, Sports Car International named the E30 M3 car number six on the list of Top Sports Cars of the 1980s.In 2007 "Evo" Magazine rated the E30 M3 Sport Evolution top of all the M series BMWs at time of printIn 2007 "Automobile Magazine included the E30 M3 in their "5 greatest drivers cars of all time" under the 25 Greatest Cars of All Time.2010 BMW M32010 BMW M32010 BMW M32010 BMW M32010 BMW
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
GTI or vRS or Cupra?
The new Volkswagen Polo GTI, Skoda Fabia vRS and Seat Ibiza SC Cupra.
All have a 176 bhp (180 PS / 132 kW) 1.4 litre petrol engine that’s both turbocharged and supercharged, all come with a seven-speed DSG dual-clutch gearbox, all will accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in about seven seconds, all have a top speed of around 140 mph (225 km/h), and all are based on the same platform.
So then, essentially the same cars. Except when it comes to price.
Perhaps unsurprisingly the Skoda is the cheapest, with a UK on the road price of £15,700 for the five-door hatch or £16,495 for the estate. Next up is the Seat, available only as a three-door at £16,545. Then comes the Volkswagen, which costs £18,275 for the three-door or £18,875 for the five-door.
Now, the Fabia may only have manual air conditioning, as opposed to the climate control that’s fitted as standard to the Ibiza and Polo, and its rear windows must be manually wound up and down. But otherwise all three cars have pretty much the same specification, which includes traction control, XDS electronic differential lock, sports seats and 17” alloy wheels.
The obvious question is why would anyone in their right mind pay the not insignificant £3,175 extra for the five-door version of the Volkswagen, instead of buying the Skoda? That’s a premium of over 20%.
Is it down to badge snobbery, or a vain fear of what others may think of Fabia drivers? Anyone who still believes there’s anything wrong with either the Skoda brand or its products is at least fifteen years behind the times, so their opinion shouldn’t really count for much anyway.
To prove that particular point, Skoda recently won the Best Car Manufacturer Award from UK consumer magazine ‘Which?’. The marque achieved 89% as a customer score, 79% for the quality of its dealerships, 81% for dealer service and 79% for reliability of cars up to eight years old. By contrast, its Audi, Volkswagen, and Seat sister brands didn’t even make the shortlist.
All have a 176 bhp (180 PS / 132 kW) 1.4 litre petrol engine that’s both turbocharged and supercharged, all come with a seven-speed DSG dual-clutch gearbox, all will accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in about seven seconds, all have a top speed of around 140 mph (225 km/h), and all are based on the same platform.
So then, essentially the same cars. Except when it comes to price.
Perhaps unsurprisingly the Skoda is the cheapest, with a UK on the road price of £15,700 for the five-door hatch or £16,495 for the estate. Next up is the Seat, available only as a three-door at £16,545. Then comes the Volkswagen, which costs £18,275 for the three-door or £18,875 for the five-door.
Now, the Fabia may only have manual air conditioning, as opposed to the climate control that’s fitted as standard to the Ibiza and Polo, and its rear windows must be manually wound up and down. But otherwise all three cars have pretty much the same specification, which includes traction control, XDS electronic differential lock, sports seats and 17” alloy wheels.
The obvious question is why would anyone in their right mind pay the not insignificant £3,175 extra for the five-door version of the Volkswagen, instead of buying the Skoda? That’s a premium of over 20%.
Is it down to badge snobbery, or a vain fear of what others may think of Fabia drivers? Anyone who still believes there’s anything wrong with either the Skoda brand or its products is at least fifteen years behind the times, so their opinion shouldn’t really count for much anyway.
To prove that particular point, Skoda recently won the Best Car Manufacturer Award from UK consumer magazine ‘Which?’. The marque achieved 89% as a customer score, 79% for the quality of its dealerships, 81% for dealer service and 79% for reliability of cars up to eight years old. By contrast, its Audi, Volkswagen, and Seat sister brands didn’t even make the shortlist.
GTI or vRS or Cupra?
The new Volkswagen Polo GTI, Skoda Fabia vRS and Seat Ibiza SC Cupra.
All have a 176 bhp (180 PS / 132 kW) 1.4 litre petrol engine that’s both turbocharged and supercharged, all come with a seven-speed DSG dual-clutch gearbox, all will accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in about seven seconds, all have a top speed of around 140 mph (225 km/h), and all are based on the same platform.
So then, essentially the same cars. Except when it comes to price.
Perhaps unsurprisingly the Skoda is the cheapest, with a UK on the road price of £15,700 for the five-door hatch or £16,495 for the estate. Next up is the Seat, available only as a three-door at £16,545. Then comes the Volkswagen, which costs £18,275 for the three-door or £18,875 for the five-door.
Now, the Fabia may only have manual air conditioning, as opposed to the climate control that’s fitted as standard to the Ibiza and Polo, and its rear windows must be manually wound up and down. But otherwise all three cars have pretty much the same specification, which includes traction control, XDS electronic differential lock, sports seats and 17” alloy wheels.
The obvious question is why would anyone in their right mind pay the not insignificant £3,175 extra for the five-door version of the Volkswagen, instead of buying the Skoda? That’s a premium of over 20%.
Is it down to badge snobbery, or a vain fear of what others may think of Fabia drivers? Anyone who still believes there’s anything wrong with either the Skoda brand or its products is at least fifteen years behind the times, so their opinion shouldn’t really count for much anyway.
To prove that particular point, Skoda recently won the Best Car Manufacturer Award from UK consumer magazine ‘Which?’. The marque achieved 89% as a customer score, 79% for the quality of its dealerships, 81% for dealer service and 79% for reliability of cars up to eight years old. By contrast, its Audi, Volkswagen, and Seat sister brands didn’t even make the shortlist.
All have a 176 bhp (180 PS / 132 kW) 1.4 litre petrol engine that’s both turbocharged and supercharged, all come with a seven-speed DSG dual-clutch gearbox, all will accelerate from 0-62 mph (100 km/h) in about seven seconds, all have a top speed of around 140 mph (225 km/h), and all are based on the same platform.
So then, essentially the same cars. Except when it comes to price.
Perhaps unsurprisingly the Skoda is the cheapest, with a UK on the road price of £15,700 for the five-door hatch or £16,495 for the estate. Next up is the Seat, available only as a three-door at £16,545. Then comes the Volkswagen, which costs £18,275 for the three-door or £18,875 for the five-door.
Now, the Fabia may only have manual air conditioning, as opposed to the climate control that’s fitted as standard to the Ibiza and Polo, and its rear windows must be manually wound up and down. But otherwise all three cars have pretty much the same specification, which includes traction control, XDS electronic differential lock, sports seats and 17” alloy wheels.
The obvious question is why would anyone in their right mind pay the not insignificant £3,175 extra for the five-door version of the Volkswagen, instead of buying the Skoda? That’s a premium of over 20%.
Is it down to badge snobbery, or a vain fear of what others may think of Fabia drivers? Anyone who still believes there’s anything wrong with either the Skoda brand or its products is at least fifteen years behind the times, so their opinion shouldn’t really count for much anyway.
To prove that particular point, Skoda recently won the Best Car Manufacturer Award from UK consumer magazine ‘Which?’. The marque achieved 89% as a customer score, 79% for the quality of its dealerships, 81% for dealer service and 79% for reliability of cars up to eight years old. By contrast, its Audi, Volkswagen, and Seat sister brands didn’t even make the shortlist.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
2010 BMW 5 Series present
The sixth generation of the 5-Series (BMW F10) made its debut on 23 November 2009 as a 2010 model.Improvements include a front dual ball joint short-long arm suspension, and rear multilink suspension. For the powertrain, there will be a ZF 8-speed automatic transmission, the single turbo inline-6 N55, and the twin-turbo V8 N63.It is designed by Adrian van Hooydonk, with a more prominent upright
2010 BMW 7 Series Improved iDrive
The new F01/F02 is equipped with a more intuitive iDrive system with a full featured web browser. This will be safer, and more technologically advanced as well as rich in entertainment.2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 Series2010 BMW 7 SeriesAll Review videos and more
2010 BMW X6 Petrol engines
Initially, the BMW X6 was available in North America (Now released in the UK) in two variants. Both use twin-turbocharged engines. The top-of-the-line model is the xDrive50i which uses an all-new 4.4-litre twin-turbocharged V8 engine. This all new version of the 550i/650i's engine (N62) is being used with twin turbo technology from the 135i/335i.2010 BMW X62010 BMW X62010 BMW X62010 BMW X6It
2010 BMW 1 Series view
The BMW 1 Series is a compact executive car manufactured by the German automaker BMW since 2004. Successor to the BMW Compact, it has been produced in four different body styles.2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1 Series2010 BMW 1
Lotus Cars History
The company was formed as Lotus Engineering Ltd. by engineer Colin Chapman, a graduate of University College, London, in 1952. The first factory was in old stables behind the Railway Hotel in Hornsey, North London. Team Lotus, which was split off from Lotus Engineering in 1954, was active and competitive in Formula One racing from 1958 to 1994.Lotus CarsLotus CarsLotus CarsThe Lotus Group of
2010 Jaguar XFR General specifications
* Name: Jaguar XFR * Manufacturer: Jaguar * Parent Company: Tata Motors * Production: 2010- * Engine: 5.0 Liter AJ-V8 * MSRP: $80,000 (or €58,000)2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFR2010 Jaguar XFRAll Review videos
Aston Martin V8 history
Aston Martin's customers had been clamouring for an eight-cylinder car for years, so Aston Martin designed a larger 2-door saloon for V8 applications.The engine was not ready, however, so in 1967 the company released the DBS with the straight-6 Vantage engine from the DB6. Two years later, Tadek Marek's V8 was ready, and Aston released the DBS V8. With the demise of the straight-6 Vantage in 1973
Aston Martin Rapide Specifications
* Unit Price: $199,950 (USD) * Engine: 6.0 L V12[4] * Power: 470 bhp (350 kW; 477 PS)[4] * Transmission: Six-speed Touchtronic * 0-100 km/h (62 mph): 5.1 secondsAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin RapideAston Martin
Aston Martin DBR9 video
Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9Aston Martin DBR9All Review videos and more of:• Infiniti• Mitsubishi• Aston Martin• Isuzu• Nissan• Audi• Jaguar • Pontiac• Bentley• Jeep• Porsche• BMW• Kia• Rolls Royce• Buick•
2010 Pontiac Vibe Demise
In January 2010, Autoblog.com reported that the 2009 and 2010 model year Pontiac Vibes are also included in the 2009–2010 Toyota vehicle recalls related to unintended acceleration due to shared components with the Toyota Matrix.However, this is an inaccurate portrayal. The Vibe has been recalled by GM's Pontiac Division, not by Toyota.Reports that Toyota will handle the recalls are also false as
2010 Lexus RX Safety
NHTSA crash test results in 2009 rated the RX 350 the maximum five stars in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, Side Driver, and Side Rear Passenger categories, and four of five stars in the Rollover category. The IIHS awarded the RX 350 its Top Safety Pick accolade, with the RX 350 given "Good" overall ratings in both frontal offset and side crash tests, the RX also received "Good" ratings in
Ford Shelby GT500 Performance
0-60 mph (0–97 km/h):3.9, 1/4 mile: 11.92s @ 120 mph (11.58 @ 122 mph (196 km/h) on drag radials)Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500Ford Shelby GT500All Review videos and more of:• Infiniti•
2010 Toyota Prius Brake fix and radar cruise
On February 9, 2010, Toyota announced a voluntary global recall of third generation 2010 Prius models manufactured from the current model's introduction through late January.Affected models, including 133,000 Prius vehicles in the U.S. and 52,000 in Europe, are to receive an anti-lock brake software update to fix brake response over rough roads, following reports of delayed braking response on
2010 Fisker Karma Tesla lawsuit
On 14 April 2008 Tesla Motors filed a lawsuit against Fisker Automotive, alleging that Henrik Fisker stole Tesla's Model S hybrid technology and is using it to develop the Karma. Tesla's suit claims that the design work done for the Model S sedan by Fisker Coachbuild was substandard, and that Fisker Automotive diverted its best ideas to the Karma .2010 Fisker Karma2010 Fisker Karma2010 Fisker
2010 Chevrolet Malibu Next generation
GM has stated the Malibu will undergo a redesign for the 2012 model year. The new model will move to the Epsilon II platform.The new model was caught undergoing testing in early 2010.2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet Malibu 2010 Chevrolet
Monday, May 24, 2010
Suzuki Kizashi Concept 3
The third Kizashi concept was an AWD vehicle that included a 3,564 cc (3.564 L; 217.5 cu in) V6 engine rated 300 hp, 6-speed automatic transmission, and 21-inch aluminium wheels with 255/30ZR21 tires. Concept Kizashi 3 was unveiled at the 2008 New York auto show.Suzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki KizashiSuzuki
Nissan Leaf Battery Pack
The battery pack is made of air-cooled stacked laminar cells with manganese oxide in the cathode.The battery and control module together weigh 480 pounds (220 kg) and the energy density of the cells is 140 W·h/kg.It is estimated that each battery pack costs Nissan $18K and expected to be half as much when mass production of the battery packs begins.Nissan LeafNissan LeafNissan LeafNissan
2011 Honda Pilot Awards
* Car and Driver magazine's Best Large SUV for 2003 through 2008 * Intellichoice "Best Value of the Year" * Edmunds.com "Most Wanted SUV" * AMI Auto World "World Family Vehicle of the Year" * Kelley Blue Book "Top 50 Most Popular Cars"2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda Pilot2011 Honda
2011 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid Features
The 2011 MKZ Hybrid was unveiled at the 2010 New York International Auto Show, with sales scheduled to start in late 2010.It is the first Lincoln hybrid and the first Lincoln model with a 4-cylinder engine and delivers an estimated fuel economy of 41 mpg-US (5.7 L/100 km; 49 mpg-imp).2011 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid2011 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid2011 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid2011 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid2011 Lincoln MKZ
2011 Chevy Cruze Eco Powertrains
Powertrains fitted to the Cruze are the 1.6 litre Family 1 four-cylinder, a 1.8 litre version of the same and a 2.0 litre VM Motori RA 420 SOHC turbocharged common rail diesel.All three engines are coupled to a five-speed manual or optional six-speed automatic transmission featuring Active Select.2011 Chevy Cruze Eco2011 Chevy Cruze Eco2011 Chevy Cruze Eco2011 Chevy Cruze Eco2011 Chevy Cruze
Mitsubishi Eclipse History
The first generation Mitsubishi Eclipse was sold as an entry to mid-level four-cylinder sports coupe. Four trim levels were available: the bottom three were front wheel drive and the very top was all wheel drive. The top FWD and the AWD model were equipped with turbocharged engines.Mitsubishi EclipseMitsubishi EclipseMitsubishi EclipseMitsubishi EclipseMitsubishi EclipseMitsubishi
2010 Audi Q5 view
Audi announced Q5 assembly would begin in 2010-03 in India to avoid import taxes and compete with BMW AG, Daimler AG and Porsche AG in the world's second-fastest growing major economy.2010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q52010 Audi Q5All Review videos and more of:• Infiniti•
2011 Ford Mustang Features
The new V6 will be a smaller 3.7 L aluminum block engine weighing 40 lb (18 kg) lighter than the outgoing version, and produces a much more powerful 305 hp (227 kW) and 280 lb·ft (380 N·m) of torque.2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford Mustang2011 Ford
2011 Nissan GT-R Design
Nissan chief creative officer, Shirō Nakamura, has likened the new GT-R to the eponymous giant robots of the Gundam series. Nakamura stated: "The GT-R is unique because it is not simply a copy of a European-designed supercar; it had to really reflect Japanese culture."Nakamura noted that the GT-R's square lines and vents were influenced by Gundam robots. Nissan's American designers sculpted the
2010 MINI Cooper Clubman name
The use of the name "Clubman" for the Mini estate van was a break with classic Mini tradition. "Clubman" was originally the name given to the 1970s face-lift of the classic Mini, which mostly resulted in a squared-off front end, whereas the classic Mini estates had traditionally been named "Traveller" or "Countryman". However, BMW did not initially purchase the rights to use those names.2010 MINI
2011 Infiniti M
A proposed hybrid sedan will include one electric motor and two clutches to allow the gas engine and electric motor to drive the rear wheels simultaneously. The lithium-ion battery pack will come from the Infiniti Essence.2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011 Infiniti M2011
Impreza Cosworth
It has been a while since the Cosworth name was last seen on a road car but now it’s back, albeit on a Subaru rather than a Ford. The STi CS400 is designed to be the ultimate Impreza and, at a fiver under £50,000, it’ll need to be.
Unsurprisingly, the 2.5-litre boxer engine has been the focus of Cosworth’s attention. It receives a modified turbo and remapped ECU, as well as reworked internal components. As a result, the STi CS400 has 395bhp (400PS / 295kW), and 540Nm of torque. Those are significant improvements over the Impreza STi Type UK which, with the 330R pack (currently being offered to UK buyers as a free upgrade until the end of June), produces 325bhp (330PS / 243kW) and 470Nm.
Almost a second is knocked off the 330R’s 0-62mph (100km/h) time, with the STi CS400 achieving the benchmark sprint in just 3.7 seconds. That’s up there with supercars like the Porsche 911 GT2 RS (3.5 seconds) and Audi R8 GT (3.6 seconds), and it makes the Ford Focus RS500 (5.6 seconds) look distinctly pedestrian.
Perhaps importantly - for Subaru at least - is the fact that its STi CS400 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 62mph than the most powerful Mitsubishi Evolution X, the £52,299 FQ-400 with its 403bhp (409PS / 301kW). One area where the STi CS400 is no quicker than either the 330R or FQ-400, however, is top speed - like them, it remains limited to 155mph.
Chassis improvements include new Bilstein shock absorbers and Eibach springs, which give the STi CS400 a wider track and allow it to ride 10mm lower. The brakes are also upgraded, with 355mm AP Racing discs at the front.
Cosmetically, the Cosworth is distinguished by a new front bumper, mesh grilles, privacy glass and a revised rear spoiler, together with new 18” alloys. The interior gets different Recaro front seats and piano black wood for the centre console.
Its price and performance means the STi CS400 can be looked at in one of two ways: Either it’s a performance bargain, costing a third of a ‘proper’ supercar like the 911 GT2 RS, or it’s just a very expensive hot hatch with a price tag almost double that of a standard £28,000 Impreza STi Type UK.
One thing for sure is that the Impreza Cosworth STi CS400 will be rare. Only 75 are to be built, and they’re all going to be right hand drive.
Unsurprisingly, the 2.5-litre boxer engine has been the focus of Cosworth’s attention. It receives a modified turbo and remapped ECU, as well as reworked internal components. As a result, the STi CS400 has 395bhp (400PS / 295kW), and 540Nm of torque. Those are significant improvements over the Impreza STi Type UK which, with the 330R pack (currently being offered to UK buyers as a free upgrade until the end of June), produces 325bhp (330PS / 243kW) and 470Nm.
Almost a second is knocked off the 330R’s 0-62mph (100km/h) time, with the STi CS400 achieving the benchmark sprint in just 3.7 seconds. That’s up there with supercars like the Porsche 911 GT2 RS (3.5 seconds) and Audi R8 GT (3.6 seconds), and it makes the Ford Focus RS500 (5.6 seconds) look distinctly pedestrian.
Perhaps importantly - for Subaru at least - is the fact that its STi CS400 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 62mph than the most powerful Mitsubishi Evolution X, the £52,299 FQ-400 with its 403bhp (409PS / 301kW). One area where the STi CS400 is no quicker than either the 330R or FQ-400, however, is top speed - like them, it remains limited to 155mph.
Chassis improvements include new Bilstein shock absorbers and Eibach springs, which give the STi CS400 a wider track and allow it to ride 10mm lower. The brakes are also upgraded, with 355mm AP Racing discs at the front.
Cosmetically, the Cosworth is distinguished by a new front bumper, mesh grilles, privacy glass and a revised rear spoiler, together with new 18” alloys. The interior gets different Recaro front seats and piano black wood for the centre console.
Its price and performance means the STi CS400 can be looked at in one of two ways: Either it’s a performance bargain, costing a third of a ‘proper’ supercar like the 911 GT2 RS, or it’s just a very expensive hot hatch with a price tag almost double that of a standard £28,000 Impreza STi Type UK.
One thing for sure is that the Impreza Cosworth STi CS400 will be rare. Only 75 are to be built, and they’re all going to be right hand drive.
Impreza Cosworth
It has been a while since the Cosworth name was last seen on a road car but now it’s back, albeit on a Subaru rather than a Ford. The STi CS400 is designed to be the ultimate Impreza and, at a fiver under £50,000, it’ll need to be.
Unsurprisingly, the 2.5-litre boxer engine has been the focus of Cosworth’s attention. It receives a modified turbo and remapped ECU, as well as reworked internal components. As a result, the STi CS400 has 395bhp (400PS / 295kW), and 540Nm of torque. Those are significant improvements over the Impreza STi Type UK which, with the 330R pack (currently being offered to UK buyers as a free upgrade until the end of June), produces 325bhp (330PS / 243kW) and 470Nm.
Almost a second is knocked off the 330R’s 0-62mph (100km/h) time, with the STi CS400 achieving the benchmark sprint in just 3.7 seconds. That’s up there with supercars like the Porsche 911 GT2 RS (3.5 seconds) and Audi R8 GT (3.6 seconds), and it makes the Ford Focus RS500 (5.6 seconds) look distinctly pedestrian.
Perhaps importantly - for Subaru at least - is the fact that its STi CS400 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 62mph than the most powerful Mitsubishi Evolution X, the £52,299 FQ-400 with its 403bhp (409PS / 301kW). One area where the STi CS400 is no quicker than either the 330R or FQ-400, however, is top speed - like them, it remains limited to 155mph.
Chassis improvements include new Bilstein shock absorbers and Eibach springs, which give the STi CS400 a wider track and allow it to ride 10mm lower. The brakes are also upgraded, with 355mm AP Racing discs at the front.
Cosmetically, the Cosworth is distinguished by a new front bumper, mesh grilles, privacy glass and a revised rear spoiler, together with new 18” alloys. The interior gets different Recaro front seats and piano black wood for the centre console.
Its price and performance means the STi CS400 can be looked at in one of two ways: Either it’s a performance bargain, costing a third of a ‘proper’ supercar like the 911 GT2 RS, or it’s just a very expensive hot hatch with a price tag almost double that of a standard £28,000 Impreza STi Type UK.
One thing for sure is that the Impreza Cosworth STi CS400 will be rare. Only 75 are to be built, and they’re all going to be right hand drive.
Unsurprisingly, the 2.5-litre boxer engine has been the focus of Cosworth’s attention. It receives a modified turbo and remapped ECU, as well as reworked internal components. As a result, the STi CS400 has 395bhp (400PS / 295kW), and 540Nm of torque. Those are significant improvements over the Impreza STi Type UK which, with the 330R pack (currently being offered to UK buyers as a free upgrade until the end of June), produces 325bhp (330PS / 243kW) and 470Nm.
Almost a second is knocked off the 330R’s 0-62mph (100km/h) time, with the STi CS400 achieving the benchmark sprint in just 3.7 seconds. That’s up there with supercars like the Porsche 911 GT2 RS (3.5 seconds) and Audi R8 GT (3.6 seconds), and it makes the Ford Focus RS500 (5.6 seconds) look distinctly pedestrian.
Perhaps importantly - for Subaru at least - is the fact that its STi CS400 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 62mph than the most powerful Mitsubishi Evolution X, the £52,299 FQ-400 with its 403bhp (409PS / 301kW). One area where the STi CS400 is no quicker than either the 330R or FQ-400, however, is top speed - like them, it remains limited to 155mph.
Chassis improvements include new Bilstein shock absorbers and Eibach springs, which give the STi CS400 a wider track and allow it to ride 10mm lower. The brakes are also upgraded, with 355mm AP Racing discs at the front.
Cosmetically, the Cosworth is distinguished by a new front bumper, mesh grilles, privacy glass and a revised rear spoiler, together with new 18” alloys. The interior gets different Recaro front seats and piano black wood for the centre console.
Its price and performance means the STi CS400 can be looked at in one of two ways: Either it’s a performance bargain, costing a third of a ‘proper’ supercar like the 911 GT2 RS, or it’s just a very expensive hot hatch with a price tag almost double that of a standard £28,000 Impreza STi Type UK.
One thing for sure is that the Impreza Cosworth STi CS400 will be rare. Only 75 are to be built, and they’re all going to be right hand drive.
Audi R8 Records
Throughout its six year history, the R8 has proven to be one of the most dominant cars in history. Indeed, of all the races it had entered over a seven year period, the R8 lost a mere sixteen races total. Here is a list of some of the achievements of the R8. * 24 Hours of Le Mans winner - 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005 * American Le Mans Series champion: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Suzuki SV650S returns
After a brief absence, the SV650S is returning to Suzuki GB’s line-up. Priced at £4,999 on the road, it seems rather a bargain - so much so that maybe Suzuki has shot itself in the foot.
That’s because spending an extra £725 on an SV650 Sport, which is the same bike except for its pillion seat cover and fairing lowers, just got much harder to justify. The S even manages to be cheaper than the similarly-engined naked Gladius, which costs £5,274 OTR.
Of course list price and actual price are two very different things. For example, there’s currently a Scottish dealer offering the Sport at £4,595, but that could be an indication that Suzuki dealers are very willing to haggle right now.
The all-rounder middleweight / ‘first big bike’ market is very crowded, with well-established models such as the Kawasaki ER-6f, Yamaha XJ6 and Honda CBF600, as well as less obvious choices such as the Ducati Monster 696 or Aprilia Shiver 750. Nevertheless, the SV650S should be able to poach sales from its competitors on price alone.
The one thing the SV650S doesn’t offer is a colour choice. It’s only available in white, with a blue racing stripe through the middle of the fairing that is carried across along the top of the tank.
That’s because spending an extra £725 on an SV650 Sport, which is the same bike except for its pillion seat cover and fairing lowers, just got much harder to justify. The S even manages to be cheaper than the similarly-engined naked Gladius, which costs £5,274 OTR.
Of course list price and actual price are two very different things. For example, there’s currently a Scottish dealer offering the Sport at £4,595, but that could be an indication that Suzuki dealers are very willing to haggle right now.
The all-rounder middleweight / ‘first big bike’ market is very crowded, with well-established models such as the Kawasaki ER-6f, Yamaha XJ6 and Honda CBF600, as well as less obvious choices such as the Ducati Monster 696 or Aprilia Shiver 750. Nevertheless, the SV650S should be able to poach sales from its competitors on price alone.
The one thing the SV650S doesn’t offer is a colour choice. It’s only available in white, with a blue racing stripe through the middle of the fairing that is carried across along the top of the tank.
Suzuki SV650S returns
After a brief absence, the SV650S is returning to Suzuki GB’s line-up. Priced at £4,999 on the road, it seems rather a bargain - so much so that maybe Suzuki has shot itself in the foot.
That’s because spending an extra £725 on an SV650 Sport, which is the same bike except for its pillion seat cover and fairing lowers, just got much harder to justify. The S even manages to be cheaper than the similarly-engined naked Gladius, which costs £5,274 OTR.
Of course list price and actual price are two very different things. For example, there’s currently a Scottish dealer offering the Sport at £4,595, but that could be an indication that Suzuki dealers are very willing to haggle right now.
The all-rounder middleweight / ‘first big bike’ market is very crowded, with well-established models such as the Kawasaki ER-6f, Yamaha XJ6 and Honda CBF600, as well as less obvious choices such as the Ducati Monster 696 or Aprilia Shiver 750. Nevertheless, the SV650S should be able to poach sales from its competitors on price alone.
The one thing the SV650S doesn’t offer is a colour choice. It’s only available in white, with a blue racing stripe through the middle of the fairing that is carried across along the top of the tank.
That’s because spending an extra £725 on an SV650 Sport, which is the same bike except for its pillion seat cover and fairing lowers, just got much harder to justify. The S even manages to be cheaper than the similarly-engined naked Gladius, which costs £5,274 OTR.
Of course list price and actual price are two very different things. For example, there’s currently a Scottish dealer offering the Sport at £4,595, but that could be an indication that Suzuki dealers are very willing to haggle right now.
The all-rounder middleweight / ‘first big bike’ market is very crowded, with well-established models such as the Kawasaki ER-6f, Yamaha XJ6 and Honda CBF600, as well as less obvious choices such as the Ducati Monster 696 or Aprilia Shiver 750. Nevertheless, the SV650S should be able to poach sales from its competitors on price alone.
The one thing the SV650S doesn’t offer is a colour choice. It’s only available in white, with a blue racing stripe through the middle of the fairing that is carried across along the top of the tank.
Chevrolet Camaro Production
Following the development of the Zeta architecture and because of its position as the GM global center of RWD development, GM Holden in Australia led the final design, engineering, and development of the Camaro.However, the new Camaro will be produced at the Oshawa Car Assembly manufacturing plant in Canada.Chevrolet Camaro Wallpapers Chevrolet Camaro
2010 Volkswagen Passat History
The Passat falls during the sedan/saloon market segment, and was critical to Volkswagen on its introduction in 1973, as the sales of the aging Beetle were declining, and larger air-cooled rear-engined models similar to the Volkswagen Type 3 and 411 and 412 based on older technology were also failing to consider hold in the market.Following a Volkswagen Group's acquisition of Audi in 1964,
2011 Mazda Atenza
The Mazda6 is currently raced in the SCCA Pro Racing Speed World Challenge Touring Car Series. Mazda finished first in the manufacturer's championship standings.Mazda6 drivers also finished first and second in the Touring Car driver points.[2011-Mazda6-Atenza] 2011 Mazda MAZDA6 2011 Mazda facelifted Mazda Atenza
Mini John Cooper Works
John Cooper Works (JCW) is a company founded in the year 2000 by John Cooper, the racing car maker and tuner responsible for the Mini Cooper. JCW produces tuning parts and accessories for BMW's new MINI.When John Cooper died shortly after creating JCW, management passed to his son Michael Cooper. BMW Group considered JCW to be "strong enough to be developed as a good sub-brand" and bought out the
Thursday, May 20, 2010
2010 Acura ZDX Price
2010 MSRP[7] US$ 45,495 US$ 49,995 US$ 56,045The 2010 Acura ZDX sport 1850 2010 Acura ZDX units 2010 Acura ZDX 2010 Acura ZDX: 2010 Acura ZDX Display Tagged: 2010 Acura ZDX 2010 Acura ZDX The 2010 Acura ZDX
Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione
The Alfa Romeo Competizione is a sports car produced by Italian automaker Alfa Romeo. It was first presented as a concept car at the 2003 Frankfurt Motor Show and later released for sale for the 2007 model year. The name refers to the 8 Cylinder (Cilindro in Italian) engine (8C) and Alfa Romeo's racing pedigree,Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione 2 2009 Alfa Romeo 8C
Alfa Romeo Spider History
The first presentation of the car, as a prototype, was at the Turin Motor Show in 1961.However, the continuing success of existing models and the economic challenges facing Italy at the time meant that the first pre-launch production Spiders began to emerge from the Pininfarina production line only at the end of 1965.Alfa Romeo Spider 2.2 JTS Images of Alfa Romeo Spider
2010 Chevrolet HHR SS Turbocharged
Chevrolet also introduced the HHR SS Panel Concept on 30 October 2007 at the 2007 SEMA Show. This was made into a production model for the 2009 model year2010 Chevrolet HHR2010 Chevrolet HHR 2010 2011 Chevrolet HHR Quotes 2010 Chevrolet HHR Panel 2010 Chevrolet HHR 2010 Chevrolet HHR Photos
Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT
The Sport GT version of the Quattroporte was introduced at the Frankfurt Motor Show in September 2005. It features a reworked transmission, exhaust, 20 inch wheels, suspension modifications, and special interior and exterior accents including a mesh grille.Maserati Quattroporte The Maserati Quattroporte has Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT
Alpina B3 S Bi-Turbo
Considering getting a BMW M3? Well, there’s now an alternative: the B3 S Bi-Turbo from Alpina.
Unlike the M3, with its normally aspirated 4.0 litre V8 producing 414 bhp (309 kW / 420 PS), the Alpina uses a modified six cylinder turbo engine. Although the B3 S Bi-Turbo has slightly less power (394 bhp / 294 kW / 400 PS), its maximum 540 Nm of torque eclipses the 400 Nm of the M3.
Consequently the Alpina, which is only available with a six-speed automatic gearbox, is able to accelerate from 0-62 mph (100km/h) in 4.7 seconds. That’s pretty much the same as the 4.8 seconds a manual M3 takes, though the M3’s time falls by 0.2 seconds if the M Double Clutch Transmission - a £2,590 option - is specified.
Unless they’re frequent users of limit-free (and traffic-free) autobahns, top speed will be largely irrelevant to most prospective buyers. Nevertheless, it appears Alpina has dumped the electronic speed limiter, because the B3 S Bi-Turbo will go on to 186 mph (300 km/h), whereas the M3 is restricted to 155 mph (250 km/h).
It’s unlikely that performance cars like these are ever going to have massive appeal for environmentalists, but the Alpina’s green credentials are certainly better than the M3’s. The B3 S Bi-Turbo will do 29.4 mpg (9.6 l/100 km) on the combined cycle, compared to the 22.8 mpg (12.4 l/100 km) an M3 will achieve.
But it’s on emissions levels that the B3 S Bi-Turbo really wins, releasing ‘only’ 224 g/km of carbon dioxide. That’s almost a quarter less than the 290 g/km the M3 produces and, although arguably still high, it’ll have a direct financial benefit for UK customers.
That’s because the Alpina will just slot into ‘Band K’ for road tax purposes, meaning an annual bill of £245. An M3 driver however will have to pay £435 each year for the privilege of keeping their ‘Band M’ car on the road. That’s a saving roughly equivalent to a couple of tanks of fuel.
The Alpina’s on the road prices also manage to be around £2,500 cheaper than an M3, depending on body style, and it’s also available as a Touring version:
Buyers of the Alpina can choose from the standard range of BMW metallic paints and Dakota leather trims (albeit with Alpina roundels in the seat backs), or they can opt for BMW Individual colours and trims.
Alternatively, Alpina’s Exclusive Blue or Exclusive Green II metallic paintwork (as shown in the pictures) is available for £1,535 extra. On the inside, Alpina ‘Lavalina’ leather re-trim packages cost from £3,065 to £7,665.
Customers might be tempted by those special paints and trims, because one area where the B3 S Bi-Turbo maybe lags behind is visual appeal. It looks like a normal 3 Series fitted with a front spoiler, revised rear valance and some body stripes, because that’s essentially what it is. There’s none of the bespoke body panels and, for the Coupe versions at least, carbon-fibre roof of the M3.
So, depending on your taste, the Alpina either lacks impact or is elegantly understated. And there’s also the potential issue of constantly having to explain to the ignorant what an Alpina is. One thing’s for sure though, whatever you think of those 20-spoke, 19” alloy wheels, they’ll be a pain to keep clean.
UK deliveries of the B3 S Bi-Turbo start in July 2010.
Unlike the M3, with its normally aspirated 4.0 litre V8 producing 414 bhp (309 kW / 420 PS), the Alpina uses a modified six cylinder turbo engine. Although the B3 S Bi-Turbo has slightly less power (394 bhp / 294 kW / 400 PS), its maximum 540 Nm of torque eclipses the 400 Nm of the M3.
Consequently the Alpina, which is only available with a six-speed automatic gearbox, is able to accelerate from 0-62 mph (100km/h) in 4.7 seconds. That’s pretty much the same as the 4.8 seconds a manual M3 takes, though the M3’s time falls by 0.2 seconds if the M Double Clutch Transmission - a £2,590 option - is specified.
Unless they’re frequent users of limit-free (and traffic-free) autobahns, top speed will be largely irrelevant to most prospective buyers. Nevertheless, it appears Alpina has dumped the electronic speed limiter, because the B3 S Bi-Turbo will go on to 186 mph (300 km/h), whereas the M3 is restricted to 155 mph (250 km/h).
It’s unlikely that performance cars like these are ever going to have massive appeal for environmentalists, but the Alpina’s green credentials are certainly better than the M3’s. The B3 S Bi-Turbo will do 29.4 mpg (9.6 l/100 km) on the combined cycle, compared to the 22.8 mpg (12.4 l/100 km) an M3 will achieve.
But it’s on emissions levels that the B3 S Bi-Turbo really wins, releasing ‘only’ 224 g/km of carbon dioxide. That’s almost a quarter less than the 290 g/km the M3 produces and, although arguably still high, it’ll have a direct financial benefit for UK customers.
That’s because the Alpina will just slot into ‘Band K’ for road tax purposes, meaning an annual bill of £245. An M3 driver however will have to pay £435 each year for the privilege of keeping their ‘Band M’ car on the road. That’s a saving roughly equivalent to a couple of tanks of fuel.
The Alpina’s on the road prices also manage to be around £2,500 cheaper than an M3, depending on body style, and it’s also available as a Touring version:
- B3 S Bi-Turbo: Coupe £50,250; Convertible £55,250; Saloon £49,250; Touring £50,250
- M3: Coupe £53,275; Convertible £57,285; Saloon £51,805
Buyers of the Alpina can choose from the standard range of BMW metallic paints and Dakota leather trims (albeit with Alpina roundels in the seat backs), or they can opt for BMW Individual colours and trims.
Alternatively, Alpina’s Exclusive Blue or Exclusive Green II metallic paintwork (as shown in the pictures) is available for £1,535 extra. On the inside, Alpina ‘Lavalina’ leather re-trim packages cost from £3,065 to £7,665.
Customers might be tempted by those special paints and trims, because one area where the B3 S Bi-Turbo maybe lags behind is visual appeal. It looks like a normal 3 Series fitted with a front spoiler, revised rear valance and some body stripes, because that’s essentially what it is. There’s none of the bespoke body panels and, for the Coupe versions at least, carbon-fibre roof of the M3.
So, depending on your taste, the Alpina either lacks impact or is elegantly understated. And there’s also the potential issue of constantly having to explain to the ignorant what an Alpina is. One thing’s for sure though, whatever you think of those 20-spoke, 19” alloy wheels, they’ll be a pain to keep clean.
UK deliveries of the B3 S Bi-Turbo start in July 2010.
Alpina B3 S Bi-Turbo
Considering getting a BMW M3? Well, there’s now an alternative: the B3 S Bi-Turbo from Alpina.
Unlike the M3, with its normally aspirated 4.0 litre V8 producing 414 bhp (309 kW / 420 PS), the Alpina uses a modified six cylinder turbo engine. Although the B3 S Bi-Turbo has slightly less power (394 bhp / 294 kW / 400 PS), its maximum 540 Nm of torque eclipses the 400 Nm of the M3.
Consequently the Alpina, which is only available with a six-speed automatic gearbox, is able to accelerate from 0-62 mph (100km/h) in 4.7 seconds. That’s pretty much the same as the 4.8 seconds a manual M3 takes, though the M3’s time falls by 0.2 seconds if the M Double Clutch Transmission - a £2,590 option - is specified.
Unless they’re frequent users of limit-free (and traffic-free) autobahns, top speed will be largely irrelevant to most prospective buyers. Nevertheless, it appears Alpina has dumped the electronic speed limiter, because the B3 S Bi-Turbo will go on to 186 mph (300 km/h), whereas the M3 is restricted to 155 mph (250 km/h).
It’s unlikely that performance cars like these are ever going to have massive appeal for environmentalists, but the Alpina’s green credentials are certainly better than the M3’s. The B3 S Bi-Turbo will do 29.4 mpg (9.6 l/100 km) on the combined cycle, compared to the 22.8 mpg (12.4 l/100 km) an M3 will achieve.
But it’s on emissions levels that the B3 S Bi-Turbo really wins, releasing ‘only’ 224 g/km of carbon dioxide. That’s almost a quarter less than the 290 g/km the M3 produces and, although arguably still high, it’ll have a direct financial benefit for UK customers.
That’s because the Alpina will just slot into ‘Band K’ for road tax purposes, meaning an annual bill of £245. An M3 driver however will have to pay £435 each year for the privilege of keeping their ‘Band M’ car on the road. That’s a saving roughly equivalent to a couple of tanks of fuel.
The Alpina’s on the road prices also manage to be around £2,500 cheaper than an M3, depending on body style, and it’s also available as a Touring version:
Buyers of the Alpina can choose from the standard range of BMW metallic paints and Dakota leather trims (albeit with Alpina roundels in the seat backs), or they can opt for BMW Individual colours and trims.
Alternatively, Alpina’s Exclusive Blue or Exclusive Green II metallic paintwork (as shown in the pictures) is available for £1,535 extra. On the inside, Alpina ‘Lavalina’ leather re-trim packages cost from £3,065 to £7,665.
Customers might be tempted by those special paints and trims, because one area where the B3 S Bi-Turbo maybe lags behind is visual appeal. It looks like a normal 3 Series fitted with a front spoiler, revised rear valance and some body stripes, because that’s essentially what it is. There’s none of the bespoke body panels and, for the Coupe versions at least, carbon-fibre roof of the M3.
So, depending on your taste, the Alpina either lacks impact or is elegantly understated. And there’s also the potential issue of constantly having to explain to the ignorant what an Alpina is. One thing’s for sure though, whatever you think of those 20-spoke, 19” alloy wheels, they’ll be a pain to keep clean.
UK deliveries of the B3 S Bi-Turbo start in July 2010.
Unlike the M3, with its normally aspirated 4.0 litre V8 producing 414 bhp (309 kW / 420 PS), the Alpina uses a modified six cylinder turbo engine. Although the B3 S Bi-Turbo has slightly less power (394 bhp / 294 kW / 400 PS), its maximum 540 Nm of torque eclipses the 400 Nm of the M3.
Consequently the Alpina, which is only available with a six-speed automatic gearbox, is able to accelerate from 0-62 mph (100km/h) in 4.7 seconds. That’s pretty much the same as the 4.8 seconds a manual M3 takes, though the M3’s time falls by 0.2 seconds if the M Double Clutch Transmission - a £2,590 option - is specified.
Unless they’re frequent users of limit-free (and traffic-free) autobahns, top speed will be largely irrelevant to most prospective buyers. Nevertheless, it appears Alpina has dumped the electronic speed limiter, because the B3 S Bi-Turbo will go on to 186 mph (300 km/h), whereas the M3 is restricted to 155 mph (250 km/h).
It’s unlikely that performance cars like these are ever going to have massive appeal for environmentalists, but the Alpina’s green credentials are certainly better than the M3’s. The B3 S Bi-Turbo will do 29.4 mpg (9.6 l/100 km) on the combined cycle, compared to the 22.8 mpg (12.4 l/100 km) an M3 will achieve.
But it’s on emissions levels that the B3 S Bi-Turbo really wins, releasing ‘only’ 224 g/km of carbon dioxide. That’s almost a quarter less than the 290 g/km the M3 produces and, although arguably still high, it’ll have a direct financial benefit for UK customers.
That’s because the Alpina will just slot into ‘Band K’ for road tax purposes, meaning an annual bill of £245. An M3 driver however will have to pay £435 each year for the privilege of keeping their ‘Band M’ car on the road. That’s a saving roughly equivalent to a couple of tanks of fuel.
The Alpina’s on the road prices also manage to be around £2,500 cheaper than an M3, depending on body style, and it’s also available as a Touring version:
- B3 S Bi-Turbo: Coupe £50,250; Convertible £55,250; Saloon £49,250; Touring £50,250
- M3: Coupe £53,275; Convertible £57,285; Saloon £51,805
Buyers of the Alpina can choose from the standard range of BMW metallic paints and Dakota leather trims (albeit with Alpina roundels in the seat backs), or they can opt for BMW Individual colours and trims.
Alternatively, Alpina’s Exclusive Blue or Exclusive Green II metallic paintwork (as shown in the pictures) is available for £1,535 extra. On the inside, Alpina ‘Lavalina’ leather re-trim packages cost from £3,065 to £7,665.
Customers might be tempted by those special paints and trims, because one area where the B3 S Bi-Turbo maybe lags behind is visual appeal. It looks like a normal 3 Series fitted with a front spoiler, revised rear valance and some body stripes, because that’s essentially what it is. There’s none of the bespoke body panels and, for the Coupe versions at least, carbon-fibre roof of the M3.
So, depending on your taste, the Alpina either lacks impact or is elegantly understated. And there’s also the potential issue of constantly having to explain to the ignorant what an Alpina is. One thing’s for sure though, whatever you think of those 20-spoke, 19” alloy wheels, they’ll be a pain to keep clean.
UK deliveries of the B3 S Bi-Turbo start in July 2010.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Triumph Sprint GT
Triumph has announced a more powerful, more practical version of the Sprint ST sports tourer.
Called Sprint GT, its 1050 cc triple-cylinder engine boasts 130 bhp, 5 bhp up on the ST. However, what really defines the new bike’s character is the maximum 108 Nm of torque, produced at 6300 rpm. That’s 1200 rpm lower down the rev range compared to the ST, which should help make the GT better suited to all-day riding.
In line with its touring role, the GT features 31 litre panniers and anti-lock brakes as standard. There’s also an optional top box, which will take two full-face helmets and incorporates a 12 volt power supply for recharging gadgets such as mobile phones. Any serious touring bike needs a decent range, and Triumph reckons that the enlarged 20 litre fuel tank will allow 200 miles (320 km) between refuelling stops.
Although the aluminium beam frame is carried over from the ST, the rest of the chassis is unique to the GT. For example, the 43 mm front forks have revised internals for improved control and damping, while an all-new rear shock comes complete with a remote pre-load adjuster wheel. The changes to the suspension have increased the wheelbase of the GT to 1537 mm, compared to 1457 mm for the ST, which should alter the feel of the bike. Braking performance and feel are also improved, thanks to lighter discs and a new pad material.
Available in Pacific Blue or Aluminium Silver, the UK price for the Sprint GT is £9,499 on the road.
Given its price and specification, there’s not much direct competition for the GT. It will probably be up against cheaper sports touring models like the Suzuki GSX1250FA (£6,999 plus road tax and first registration fee). Alternatively, the GT could steal sales from larger capacity, more expensive bikes such as the Honda VFR1200F (£12,075 OTR), BMW K 1300 GT (£12,840 OTR) and Yamaha FJR1300A (£14,624 OTR), provided potential buyers were willing to sacrifice the convenience of shaft drive.
The lack of obvious rivals might mean Triumph has a small market niche all to itself.
Called Sprint GT, its 1050 cc triple-cylinder engine boasts 130 bhp, 5 bhp up on the ST. However, what really defines the new bike’s character is the maximum 108 Nm of torque, produced at 6300 rpm. That’s 1200 rpm lower down the rev range compared to the ST, which should help make the GT better suited to all-day riding.
In line with its touring role, the GT features 31 litre panniers and anti-lock brakes as standard. There’s also an optional top box, which will take two full-face helmets and incorporates a 12 volt power supply for recharging gadgets such as mobile phones. Any serious touring bike needs a decent range, and Triumph reckons that the enlarged 20 litre fuel tank will allow 200 miles (320 km) between refuelling stops.
Although the aluminium beam frame is carried over from the ST, the rest of the chassis is unique to the GT. For example, the 43 mm front forks have revised internals for improved control and damping, while an all-new rear shock comes complete with a remote pre-load adjuster wheel. The changes to the suspension have increased the wheelbase of the GT to 1537 mm, compared to 1457 mm for the ST, which should alter the feel of the bike. Braking performance and feel are also improved, thanks to lighter discs and a new pad material.
Available in Pacific Blue or Aluminium Silver, the UK price for the Sprint GT is £9,499 on the road.
Given its price and specification, there’s not much direct competition for the GT. It will probably be up against cheaper sports touring models like the Suzuki GSX1250FA (£6,999 plus road tax and first registration fee). Alternatively, the GT could steal sales from larger capacity, more expensive bikes such as the Honda VFR1200F (£12,075 OTR), BMW K 1300 GT (£12,840 OTR) and Yamaha FJR1300A (£14,624 OTR), provided potential buyers were willing to sacrifice the convenience of shaft drive.
The lack of obvious rivals might mean Triumph has a small market niche all to itself.
Triumph Sprint GT
Triumph has announced a more powerful, more practical version of the Sprint ST sports tourer.
Called Sprint GT, its 1050 cc triple-cylinder engine boasts 130 bhp, 5 bhp up on the ST. However, what really defines the new bike’s character is the maximum 108 Nm of torque, produced at 6300 rpm. That’s 1200 rpm lower down the rev range compared to the ST, which should help make the GT better suited to all-day riding.
In line with its touring role, the GT features 31 litre panniers and anti-lock brakes as standard. There’s also an optional top box, which will take two full-face helmets and incorporates a 12 volt power supply for recharging gadgets such as mobile phones. Any serious touring bike needs a decent range, and Triumph reckons that the enlarged 20 litre fuel tank will allow 200 miles (320 km) between refuelling stops.
Although the aluminium beam frame is carried over from the ST, the rest of the chassis is unique to the GT. For example, the 43 mm front forks have revised internals for improved control and damping, while an all-new rear shock comes complete with a remote pre-load adjuster wheel. The changes to the suspension have increased the wheelbase of the GT to 1537 mm, compared to 1457 mm for the ST, which should alter the feel of the bike. Braking performance and feel are also improved, thanks to lighter discs and a new pad material.
Available in Pacific Blue or Aluminium Silver, the UK price for the Sprint GT is £9,499 on the road.
Given its price and specification, there’s not much direct competition for the GT. It will probably be up against cheaper sports touring models like the Suzuki GSX1250FA (£6,999 plus road tax and first registration fee). Alternatively, the GT could steal sales from larger capacity, more expensive bikes such as the Honda VFR1200F (£12,075 OTR), BMW K 1300 GT (£12,840 OTR) and Yamaha FJR1300A (£14,624 OTR), provided potential buyers were willing to sacrifice the convenience of shaft drive.
The lack of obvious rivals might mean Triumph has a small market niche all to itself.
Called Sprint GT, its 1050 cc triple-cylinder engine boasts 130 bhp, 5 bhp up on the ST. However, what really defines the new bike’s character is the maximum 108 Nm of torque, produced at 6300 rpm. That’s 1200 rpm lower down the rev range compared to the ST, which should help make the GT better suited to all-day riding.
In line with its touring role, the GT features 31 litre panniers and anti-lock brakes as standard. There’s also an optional top box, which will take two full-face helmets and incorporates a 12 volt power supply for recharging gadgets such as mobile phones. Any serious touring bike needs a decent range, and Triumph reckons that the enlarged 20 litre fuel tank will allow 200 miles (320 km) between refuelling stops.
Although the aluminium beam frame is carried over from the ST, the rest of the chassis is unique to the GT. For example, the 43 mm front forks have revised internals for improved control and damping, while an all-new rear shock comes complete with a remote pre-load adjuster wheel. The changes to the suspension have increased the wheelbase of the GT to 1537 mm, compared to 1457 mm for the ST, which should alter the feel of the bike. Braking performance and feel are also improved, thanks to lighter discs and a new pad material.
Available in Pacific Blue or Aluminium Silver, the UK price for the Sprint GT is £9,499 on the road.
Given its price and specification, there’s not much direct competition for the GT. It will probably be up against cheaper sports touring models like the Suzuki GSX1250FA (£6,999 plus road tax and first registration fee). Alternatively, the GT could steal sales from larger capacity, more expensive bikes such as the Honda VFR1200F (£12,075 OTR), BMW K 1300 GT (£12,840 OTR) and Yamaha FJR1300A (£14,624 OTR), provided potential buyers were willing to sacrifice the convenience of shaft drive.
The lack of obvious rivals might mean Triumph has a small market niche all to itself.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Mercedes-Benz R Class Security
The R-Class was tested by Thatcham's New Vehicle Security Ratings (NVSR) organisation and achieved the following ratings:Theft Of: 5/5 starsTheft From: 4/5 starsthe Mercedes Benz R-Class 2008 Mercedes-Benz R-Class 2011 Mercedes-Benz R-Class Mercedes-Benz R-Class CDI SE Mercedes Benz
2010 Mercedes Benz CL Class Engines
As with all major German manufacturers (except Porsche) Mercedes electronically limits their cars to 250 km/h (155 mph), except for the AMG models (option).2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class 2010 Mercedes-Benz
Opel Astra OPC Gallery
Opel Astra OPC Wallpaper - 3 Opel Astra OPC Wallpaper - 2 Opel astra opc 2005 Opel Astra OPC opel astra opc nurburgring opel astra opc race camp 016 Opel Astra OPC opel astra opc x-treme
Pagani Zonda R Clubsport
The R Clubsport was debuted at the Geneva Motor Show 2007, using the 6.0 litre V12 sourced from the race version Mercedes-Benz CLK-GTR.The R Clubsport's competition lies with track-biased cars such as the Ferrari FXX and Maserati MC12 Corsa rather than the original Zonda's road competitors.It is thought, therefore, that like the FXX and some models of the MC12, the R CS will not be
Econogo Yogo scooter
Electric scooters are nothing new, and on the face of it they’re an environmentally friendly way of getting around. But they’re not much use if you live in an upper storey apartment and don’t fancy dangling extension cables out of the window to recharge it, or the commute to and from work is just that bit further than the battery’s range.
There’s now a solution for UK buyers: The Econogo Yogo. Its makers claim it’s the first production scooter to feature a removable lithium battery, which means users can simply lift it out and take it indoors to recharge.
In standard specification, the Yogo manages 30 mph, although the slightly more powerful ‘S’ version will reach 40 mph. Both have a range of 22 miles, with recharging taking just one hour. That range can easily be doubled, because the Yogo has space on board for a second battery - the rider just needs to remember to flick a switch to transfer between batteries when one is getting low on charge.
Arguably, the environmental benefits of electric scooters like the Yogo are debateable if the electricity is being generated from fossil fuels in the first place. Then there’s the question of the energy and resources needed to produce those lithium batteries, as well as the issues around end of life disposal or recycling.
However, with petrol now costing around £1.20 per litre (a staggering £5.46 per gallon), the motive to go electric might increasingly become purely economic.
Both versions of the Econogo Yogo are priced at £1,999.
There’s now a solution for UK buyers: The Econogo Yogo. Its makers claim it’s the first production scooter to feature a removable lithium battery, which means users can simply lift it out and take it indoors to recharge.
In standard specification, the Yogo manages 30 mph, although the slightly more powerful ‘S’ version will reach 40 mph. Both have a range of 22 miles, with recharging taking just one hour. That range can easily be doubled, because the Yogo has space on board for a second battery - the rider just needs to remember to flick a switch to transfer between batteries when one is getting low on charge.
Arguably, the environmental benefits of electric scooters like the Yogo are debateable if the electricity is being generated from fossil fuels in the first place. Then there’s the question of the energy and resources needed to produce those lithium batteries, as well as the issues around end of life disposal or recycling.
However, with petrol now costing around £1.20 per litre (a staggering £5.46 per gallon), the motive to go electric might increasingly become purely economic.
Both versions of the Econogo Yogo are priced at £1,999.
Econogo Yogo scooter
Electric scooters are nothing new, and on the face of it they’re an environmentally friendly way of getting around. But they’re not much use if you live in an upper storey apartment and don’t fancy dangling extension cables out of the window to recharge it, or the commute to and from work is just that bit further than the battery’s range.
There’s now a solution for UK buyers: The Econogo Yogo. Its makers claim it’s the first production scooter to feature a removable lithium battery, which means users can simply lift it out and take it indoors to recharge.
In standard specification, the Yogo manages 30 mph, although the slightly more powerful ‘S’ version will reach 40 mph. Both have a range of 22 miles, with recharging taking just one hour. That range can easily be doubled, because the Yogo has space on board for a second battery - the rider just needs to remember to flick a switch to transfer between batteries when one is getting low on charge.
Arguably, the environmental benefits of electric scooters like the Yogo are debateable if the electricity is being generated from fossil fuels in the first place. Then there’s the question of the energy and resources needed to produce those lithium batteries, as well as the issues around end of life disposal or recycling.
However, with petrol now costing around £1.20 per litre (a staggering £5.46 per gallon), the motive to go electric might increasingly become purely economic.
Both versions of the Econogo Yogo are priced at £1,999.
There’s now a solution for UK buyers: The Econogo Yogo. Its makers claim it’s the first production scooter to feature a removable lithium battery, which means users can simply lift it out and take it indoors to recharge.
In standard specification, the Yogo manages 30 mph, although the slightly more powerful ‘S’ version will reach 40 mph. Both have a range of 22 miles, with recharging taking just one hour. That range can easily be doubled, because the Yogo has space on board for a second battery - the rider just needs to remember to flick a switch to transfer between batteries when one is getting low on charge.
Arguably, the environmental benefits of electric scooters like the Yogo are debateable if the electricity is being generated from fossil fuels in the first place. Then there’s the question of the energy and resources needed to produce those lithium batteries, as well as the issues around end of life disposal or recycling.
However, with petrol now costing around £1.20 per litre (a staggering £5.46 per gallon), the motive to go electric might increasingly become purely economic.
Both versions of the Econogo Yogo are priced at £1,999.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)